Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Patel v Folkestone Nursing Home Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1843, the Court of Appeal held that an employee who was told that an initial decision to dismiss him had been revoked following his successful internal appeal had not been dismissed, and that an employment tribunal had therefore erred in concluding that it could hear his claims of wrongful and unfair dismissal.

However, the Court went on to hold that the employee was entitled to argue that the manner in which the employer dealt with the appeal, failing to address serious allegations made against the employee, was a fundamental breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence.

The facts in Patel v Folkstone Nursing Home

Folkestone Nursing Home (FNH Ltd) employed Mr Ramesh Patel (the Claimant) as a healthcare assistant. His contract of employment included a disciplinary procedure which provided for an appeal against a decision to dismiss. The Claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct in April 2014 for sleeping on duty and falsifying residents’ records. He appealed, was successful and notified in a letter that the decision to dismiss him would be revoked because, as the Claimant was on an unpaid break when asleep, he had not breached any company rules and procedures.

However, the Claimant was dissatisfied that the letter did not deal with the allegation that he had falsified records. He refused to return to work and, on 17 July 2014, presented claims of wrongful and unfair dismissal to an employment tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had been dismissed, for two reasons: First, he could not be contractually bound by the outcome of his appeal as FNH Ltd’s disciplinary procedure did not make any provision for this and secondly, the ‘revocation’ of the Claimant’s dismissal was unclear. The second disciplinary allegation was not mentioned and in this respect, the Claimant’s position was also unclear; he could therefore consider himself dismissed.

The decision of the EAT

FNH Ltd appealed successfully to the EAT. It referred to the case of Salmon v Castlebeck Care (Teesdale) Limited [2014] UKEAT/0304/14/DM, where Mr Justice Langstaff held that there was no reason why it would be necessary for there to be an express revival or reinstatement of employment, since it must be implicit in any system of appeal that the appeal panel has the right to reverse or vary the original decision. The Claimant appealed.

The Court of Appeal’s decision

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. Lord Justice Sales, giving the only judgment, held that it is implicit in a contractual term conferring a right to appeal against dismissal that, if an appeal is successful, the effect is that both employer and employee are bound to treat the employment relationship as having remained in existence throughout. The object of the appeal is that the employee is contractually entitled to ask the employer to reopen its previous decision to dismiss and to substitute a decision that there should not be a dismissal.

Sales LJ then went on to consider the poor manner in which FNH Ltd had dealt with the Claimant’s appeal. He noted that it was strongly arguable that FNH Ltd was in breach of the duty of trust and confidence in failing to resolve the more serious of the allegations against the Claimant. It was arguable that it was a breach for FNH Ltd not to withdraw the allegation of faking records and that the Claimant could potentially advance the argument that he had been constructively dismissed.

Our solicitors’ view on Patel v Folkestone Nursing Home Ltd

Caroline Lewis, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “While this case does not break new ground, it is a clear and compelling reminder that a successful internal appeal against dismissal will make the original dismissal ‘disappear’. The contract will be revived as if no dismissal had ever taken place. Employers must take back an employee following a successful appeal, and an employee cannot choose to remain dismissed (unless there has been a fundamental breach of contract that might justify a ‘new’ claim for constructive dismissal). As the original dismissal is eradicated by a successful appeal, the employee should return to the same role on the same terms and conditions”.

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Patel v Folkestone Nursing Home Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1843 can be found here

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Tagged with →  

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.78 Average

138 Reviews

Richard O

Chris at Redmans is my go-to legal expert when it comes to employee-related matters. His depth of knowledge, experience and considered approach to problems and their solutions is highly valuable. I cannot recommend Redmans highly enough.

Posted 3 days ago

Rory Y

They provide me with timely and clear advice!

Posted 4 days ago

Steven C

Redmans handled my settlement with my employer quickly, decisively and to a standard that I was very happy with. I would in similar circumstances contract them again

Posted 4 days ago

Deepthi K

Transparent. Clear communication. Prompt reply’s. Saves lot of time. Very satisfied.

Posted 4 days ago

Anonymous

Chris and Sacha did a fantastic job and negotiated a significant better settlement agreement

Posted 4 days ago

Dino D

I did get a very swift and god service from Redmans

Posted 4 days ago

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 1 month ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 9 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 11 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 11 months ago