Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In this, our next post in our series on the primary infringement of copyrighted works, we will be looking at the primary infringement of renting and lending copyrighted works to the public under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (or “CPDA 1988”). This post will be divided into 2 parts:

  1. An explanation of the primary infringement of renting and lending copyrighted works to the public, which will include worked examples of when primary infringement may or may not occur
  2. Practical tips for both owners of copyright and potential infringers

An explanation of the primary infringement of renting and lending copyrighted works to the public

This particular primary infringement occurs if a non-authorized person rents or lends a copyrighted work to the public. Let’s divide this up and explore the meaning of the following areas:

  1. Renting
  2. Lending
  3. Copyrighted work
  4. The public

Renting

Renting is defined under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 as making a copy of the work available for use, on terms that it will or may be returned, for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage.

A person would commit the primary infringement of renting a work to the public if, for example, they rented a copy of a pirated DVD to a friend for a couple of pounds on the condition that they returned  the DVD afterwards. This would be direct economic advantage. Indirect economic advantage could be, for example, two friends swapping pirated music CD’s on the condition that when each had finished with the other’s CD that they would return it.

Even should the other party not return the work as agreed it would infringe on copyright as the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 states that it is infringement even if it “may” be returned – what matters is the intention of the party renting the copyrighted work at the time of the transaction. Whether the copyrighted work is actually returned or not is of no consequence.

Lending

Lending is defined under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 as making a copy of the work available for use on terms that it will or may be returned otherwise than for direct or indirect economic or commercial advantage through an establishment which is accessible to the public.

The primary infringement of lending is clearly aimed at the lending of works by educational establishments and public libraries. Private libraries would not be caught under the infringement of lending but of “renting” because they are lending the work for direct economic or commercial advantage. However, public libraries and educational establishments will not be infringing copyright if they charge what is necessary to cover the costs of running the establishment. Thus, your public library is not infringing on copyright for charging you £2 to rent a copy of “Jurassic Park” (although it’s a bit steep considering that you can purchase the DVD on Amazon for a comparable amount). However, if the public library charged more than was necessary to cover the costs of running the establishment (say £10 to rent a copy) and clearly making a profit then they may be infringing copyright.

What does not constitute renting or lending?

Making copies of the work available for:

  • The purpose of public performance, playing or showing in public or communication to the public. However, making a copy of a sound recording or a film to show it in public may be a secondary infringement;
  • Exhibition in public; or
  • On-the-spot reference use

Thus, showing “Jurassic Park” to a classroom of children would not infringe copyright. However, making a copy of this film to show to the children may infringe copyright. Further, displaying a copy of “Jurassic Park” in public (such as in a shop window) would not infringe copyright, nor would allowing library-users to view a copy of “Jurassic Park” at the library.

Which ‘types’ of copyright are caught?

The copyrighted works that this particular infringement applies to are:

  • Literary, Dramatic or Musical copyrighted works
  • Artistic copyrighted works (excluding architectural works and applied art)

It does not some copyrighted works i.e. broadcasts.

Practical tips

For copyright owners:

  1. If you think your copyright rights in your work are being infringed then get legal advice as soon as possible

For potential infringers:

  1. (Obvious point) Don’t pirate works. Secondly, don’t lend or rent pirated or original works to others
  2. Public libraries: be careful as to how much you charge for lending copyrighted works to the public

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name

Your last name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

193 Reviews

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 3 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 3 weeks ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 4 weeks ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 month ago