Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Sheikh v ADT (Tyco) Fire & Security UKEAT/0095/18/JOJ, Mr Sheikh claimed that he was subject to less favourable treatment because of race and/or disability in that he was being denied an opportunity for promotion by way of a grade rise, even though other non-disabled people had been promoted. He claimed that he had been waiting 6-7 years for a grade rise and 4 years for an appraisal. His claim of race and disability discrimination was dismissed by the ET and he appealed.

The EAT dismissed the appeal. They rejected the Claimant’s argument that he had made numerous requests for appraisals. The ET found as fact, on evidence which it was entitled to accept, that there was only one appraisal and the Claimant had not sought another.

The facts in Sheikh v ADT (Tyco) Fire & Security

The Claimant had worked as an engineer for the Respondent since 2006. The Respondent’s appraisal system was not very effective but engineers could request an appraisal if they wished a grade increase. The Claimant did so on 21 November 2012. The Claimant stated that Mr Baldwinson, his appraiser who also worked for the Respondent, made derogatory comments about the Claimant’s IT skills. The Claimant scored 72 out of 124 in the appraisal and Mr Baldwinson encouraged him to improve his IT skills. The procedure, in so far that there was one, to a grade increase had three components: an appraisal providing a target/goals setting, a meeting to follow up on this and a third requirement of a written grade test.

The tribunal found that the Claimant (who was a litigant in person) never asked for a second appraisal (stage 2) or to take a written test (stage 3). The tribunal had also found that at the initial hearing, the Claimant had been unable to present evidence showing that other engineers were being promoted in front of him and that this was because of discriminatory motives. The Claimant’s complaint, the tribunal felt, was a generic one about his lack of promotion and he could not mention any names of those promoted unfairly above him.

The decision of the EAT

The EAT concluded that the appeal had been allowed in order to deal with the fact that the Claimant believed that the tribunal had failed to deal with the assertion in his grievance letter that the Respondent would have been able to identify individuals who had been promoted, from its own records and this might have revealed disability/race discrimination.

The EAT stated that the task of the Tribunal had been to establish not why the Claimant had not progressed beyond grade 4, but to decide whether there was evidence before it from which it could conclude, absent any explanation, that the reason for his failure to progress was his disability. To that end the onus was on the Claimant to establish a prima facie case including the adducing of comparator evidence showing that his treatment was less favourable.

The EAT considered that the Claimant had not done so before the tribunal, that the tribunal was entitled to come to the decision it did and that there was no basis for the appeal which would be dismissed.

Our solicitors’ view on Sheikh v ADT (Tyco) Fire & Security

Caroline Lewis, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case helps remind us of the advice provided by the CAB and Employment Tribunal Service to litigants in person that: “When you make a discrimination claim, you need to provide the employment tribunal with evidence from which it could decide that discrimination has happened. Only then is the employer required to show that discrimination has not happened. The obligation on you to provide this evidence is called the initial burden of proof. When you’ve done so, the burden of proof shifts to your employer. To satisfy your burden of proof, you need to show the tribunal facts from which the tribunal could decide, without any other explanation from your employer, that you’ve been discriminated against. If you can’t show these facts, your claim won’t succeed”.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

164 Reviews

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 1 week ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 1 week ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 1 week ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 1 week ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good and quick service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Ricky D

Very satisfying to be assured of such attention and professionalism.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Excellent service - thankyou

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Efficient, timely and friendly support and advice

Posted 2 weeks ago

Ahmed S

They are always on hand when you need them and provide support even when its not necessary.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Nemen S

Wonderful experience.Chris was very responsive and provided an excellent service. A real professional who I would recommend to anyone

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Their guidance was clear and they provided me with all the information I required. Friendly yet professional

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris @ Redmans assisted me with an employment issue. Firstly, he was very proactive in coming back to my initial enquiry and then helped to clearly lay out the options that I had in relation to my position. He then assisted with the preparation of my case, which led to a very satisfactory outcome. I would highly recommend the quality of service & professionalism offered by Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Great service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris was very effective and decisive in dealing with my matter. I felt guided, and the pressure to make decisions was taken off my shoulders; he knew what needed to be done and I was happy to follow his advice. The result of the legal dispute was a great success for me. He is also kind and personable. The only thing that I would say it could be improved, is the accuracy of cost estimation at the beginning: not many activites, that could not have been forseen had to take place, but costs went up more than double in the end. Overall very good and trustworthy. I would definately recommend and use Redmans services again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 1 month ago