Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr P James v Huisman International (UK) Limited 3307490/2018, the Employment Tribunal held a botched settlement agreement offer had led to the dismissal of a Claimant (and a subsequently successful unfair dismissal claim in which the Claimant was awarded £30,000).

The facts in Mr P James v Huisman International (UK) Limited

Mr James commenced employment with Huisman International (UK) Limited (“Huisman”) in October 2004. Mr James ran Huisman’s depot in Corby, coordinating the warehouse and transport activities.

It was decided that the Corby depot needed a warehouse supervisor to be recruited. Mr James commenced the interview process for recruiting a supervisor but was then told to pause that process until he heard further from Mr Janssen. A warehouse supervisor was then sourced, a Dutch person personally known to Mr Janssen (whose name was Tim van Haren).

After Mr van Haren commenced working at the Corby depot an atmosphere of tension was created, provoked by Mr van Haren’s view that his approach was the better approach. This tension resulted in problems with existing customers and deliveries.

In January 2018 Mr James was on holiday when he received a WhatsApp message from Mr Scholten asking whether he was having a nice holiday, and stating that he was planning to visit Mr James the next Monday.

Mr James returned to work from his holiday on 12 February 2018 and, upon his attendance at the office at 6am, noted that all of his files relating to a company customer had been removed from his desk and were on Mr van Haren’s desk.

Mr Scholten arrived at the warehouse at approx 10am that day and invited Mr James to a meeting for “a chat”. When Mr James entered the meeting room he was told that “this was not going to be a good conversation” and that his services were no longer required. Mr Scholten slid some documentation towards Mr James and informed him that this was a settlement agreement, and that Mr James would need to obtain professional advice on this. Mr Scholten stated that Mr James would have ten days in which to sign the settlement agreement, that he should leave the warehouse at once, and that he should not come back. Mr Scholten later stated in evidence that this conversation had been held on a ‘without prejudice’ basis; Mr James disagreed.

After the ten days passed Mr James wrote to Mr Scholten (on 19 February 2018) to state that he believed that he had been dismissed from his employment, that he believed that the dismissal was unfair, and that he was entitled to compensation. He stated that he would not be accepting the settlement offer that had been made. Neither Mr Scholten nor the company’s solicitors wrote back to Mr James to state that he had not been dismissed. The company also stopped paying Mr James on 2 March 2018.

On 19 March 2018 a further meeting took place by way of Skype. Mr James attended this meeting, as did Mr Janssen. Mr Janssen did not produce any evidence of poor performance but by Mr James, but alleged that complaints had been made about him

Mr James subsequently wrote to Huisman again on 23 March 2018 to reiterate that he believed that he had been dismissed as of 12 February 2018, that he believed that the disciplinary meeting on 19 March 2018 was a ‘travesty’ and a sham, and that if he had not been dismissed as of 12 February 2018 then he believed that he had been constructively dismissed as a result of both the conduct of Mr Scholten on 12 February 2018 and the failure to pay him since 2 March 2018

Huisman then wrote to Mr James on 23 March 2018 purporting to send him a letter in which he was given a final written warning.

Mr James subsequently made a claim in the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and, in the alternative, constructive unfair dismissal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Employment Tribunal held that Mr James had been dismissed by Huisman as of 12 February 2018, and that it was clear that a dismissal had taken place on that date: Mr James was told to leave and not come back, that he was offered a settlement agreement, that he would have ten days in which to sign the settlement agreement (in which time he could retain the company car and credit card, but not after, the subsequent correspondence from Mr James confirming this, and the fact that Huisman stopped paying Mr James as of 2 March 2018.

The Employment Tribunal further held that the meeting of 12 February 2018 was not privileged, as they did not find that Mr Scholten had stated that the meeting was ‘without prejudice’ at the start.

The Employment Tribunal found Mr James’ dismissal to be both procedurally and substantively unfair.

At a subsequent remedy hearing the Employment Tribunal noted that the parties had agreed an agreement on remedy, that Huisman would pay Mr James £30,000 as compensation, and that settlement terms would be agreed in full and final settlement of Mr James’ claims.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of in Mr P James v Huisman International (UK) Limited

Chris Hadrill, partner in the employment team at Redmans, commented on the case as follows: “This case shows, among other things, that botched settlement agreement offers can come back to haunt a Respondent. The failure to carry out a competent without prejudice meeting and to carry out a fair disciplinary process ultimately sealed the company’s fate in the Employment Tribunal claim”.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr P James v Huisman International (UK) Limited ET/3307490/2018 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.79 Average

    274 Reviews

    Mary B

    I was very happy with the work Chris did for me. I believe with his help I secured a more favourable outcome both financially and in terms of clauses contained in the legal agreement I ultimately signed. I had utmost trust and confidence in the advice Chris provided throughout. Chris kept me informed at every stage and I found him very efficient at bringing matters to a conclusion without unnecessary delay.

    Posted 1 day ago

    Mark M

    I found Redmans very easy to work with. Mel was very responsive, her advice led to an improved settlement. . Recommended.!

    Posted 3 days ago

    Anonymous

    Fantastic service. I would recommend Redmans to anyone who needed a Solicitor. The communication was second to none and consistent clear guidance was given.

    Posted 5 days ago

    Anonymous

    Everyone I dealt with at Redmans were professional, empathetic & always responded promptly and helped make the transition as smooth & efficient as possible for me. If you need legal advice, don’t hesitate & contact the team.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was incredibly helpful and professional. Timely and accurate advice at a time I most needed it. I was extremely impressed and grateful.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Sue W

    The people at Redmans talk to you with respect and make you feel like they take your situation personal. They clearly care and are extremely professional. I have recommended Redmans to many people.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Redmans Solicitors were consistently prompt, efficient and professional from the start of my reaching out to them for support in relation to contentious negotiations of an employment matter that continued for almost two months resulting in a positive settlement agreement. Chris Hadrill was diligent, thorough, empathetic and objective in his advice and guidance, showing deep and broad knowledge of the law and legal processes plus extensive practical experience in handling complex matters, resulting in clear and pragmatic advice in ambiguous circumstances that resulted in a very good outcome. I fully recommend Chris Hadrill and Redmans Solicitors! I have made this review anonymous purely because of the confidentiality obligations in the settlement agreement concluded.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Michelle W

    Redmans solicitors provided legal support and advice for a settlement agreement. Excellent customer service, very professional. The senior associate solicitor kept me updated throughout the process, showed empathy and the agreement was signed-off / completed within the agreed timeline.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Mark W

    Redmans Solicitors were extremely professional and helpful! Chris Hadrill handled my case and was an amazing help! His guidance, advice and understanding to my redundancy settlement were always clear, concise and very helpful and I am very grateful to him, and glad I found Redmans to help with my settlement. I highly recommend them!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Alison M

    Very happy with the advice I received

    Posted 2 months ago

    Margaret A

    I found everything about the company to be extremely professional and efficient. During my initial contact with Chris, he listened well and was reassuring, so I felt confident that my case would be well handled. Caroline was excellent at explaining all the legal points and answering my questions, as well as being very supportive and understanding throughout the process. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Sanja K

    Very efficient and professional service.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    I found the advice I was given by Redmans Solicitors to be clear and useful and found the solicitor on my case to be both knowledgeable and approachable.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Karen T

    Great service. Thank you.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service from Chris & Mel Chin. The best outcome was achieved from the redundancy process. They were extremely thorough, listened carefully and acted swiftly on my behalf. I highly recommend Redmans Solicitors

    Posted 2 months ago

    Shanine M

    Excellent service, thank you so much!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    I found Caroline and Chris very Helpful and provided excellent service. Caroline especially provided great legal advice and made me feel at ease with the whole process. I would highly recommend them. Thank you!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Gayle B

    Excellent company very professional would definitely recommend

    Posted 2 months ago

    Alex K

    Redmans provided an excellent service, timely and effective. Will definitely recommend.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Great job done on my employment law

    Posted 2 months ago

    Dominica S

    Caroline & Chris were very prompt and efficient.Very happy with the service and will definitely recommend Redmans Solicitor to everyone !

    Posted 2 months ago