Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd UKEAT/0040/17 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) held that a dismissed employee’s belief in the right to own the output of her own creative work could not amount, in this instance, to a ‘philosophical belief’.

The factual background of Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd

Ms Gray commenced employment with Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd (“Mulberry”) in 2015 as a market support assistant; she was also at the relevant times a write and a film-maker. In her role Ms Gray had access to some of Mulberry’s designs ahead of their market launch.

At the start of Ms Gray’s employment with Mulberry she was asked to sign a contract of employment. The contract of employment contained a confidentiality clause as well as a clause relating to intellectual property – the intellectual property clause provided that Ms Gray would assign the copyright and other proprietary rights to Mulberry in respect of all works and designs originated, conceived, written or made by her in the course of her employment.

Ms Gray objected to the intellectual property clause as she claimed that it would interfere with her own work as a writer and film-maker; she was worried that this clause meant that intellectual property that she created outside of her employment could be assigned to Mulberry.

In response to the concerns she raised Mulberry agreed to amend the intellectual property clause so that it was clear that the only work that would be relevant to the clause was work that related to its business; however, Ms Gray still refused to sign the agreement. After several meetings it became clear to Mulberry HR that Ms Gray would not sign the agreement and she was dismissed for refusing to comply with her contract of employment. During her employment Ms Gray had not asserted that she held any form of relevant philosophical belief, nor did she assert that she was dismissed because of such.

Ms Gray subsequently made a clam in the Employment Tribunal for direct and indirect discrimination on grounds of philosophical belief. She described her belief as “the statutory moral or human right to own the copyright and moral rights of her own creative works and output.”

The Employment Tribunal rejected Ms Gray’s claims, finding that her belief was genuinely held and concerned a substantial and weighty aspect of human life, but that the belief was not sufficiently cohesive to be defined as a “philosophical belief” under section 10(2) Equality Act 2010 (applying the “Grainger formula”, as analysed in this post).

Ms Gray appealed against this decision to the EAT.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The EAT dismissed the appeal, finding that the Tribunal had not made an error of law in its application of the Grainger criteria.

The EAT further held that the reason for her dismissal was because she had signed her contract of employment – whilst this refusal may have been prompted by her belief, it did not mean that she had been dismissed because she had manifested her belief: she had not made her belief known to her employer and the only reason that she had given for refusing to sign her contract was that Mulberry might gain rights over her creative output; there was not at any point an assertion that her refusal to sign her contract was driven by a philosophical belief she held.

Our solicitors’ comments on Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case shows that a ‘philosophical belief’ should normally be some sort of ‘philosophical touchstone’ and divorced from the relevant claimant’s personal and commercial interests”.

The full decision of the EAT in Gray v Mulberry Company (Design) Ltd UKEAT/0040/17 can be found here

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

197 Reviews

Rosa B

Fabulous service all round.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

Redmans were quick to respond to my enquiry and dealt with my case professionally and personably. I received sound advice and was put at ease by Chris Hadrill, Partner.

Posted 2 days ago

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Posted 1 month ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 2 months ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 2 months ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 2 months ago