Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

redmans-blog-analysisIn the case of Whiteman v CPS Interiors Ltd and others ET/2601103/2015 an Employment Tribunal held that the rejection by an interior design company of an employee’s request to work flexibly upon her return from maternity leave was not discriminatory and was handled reasonably.

Ms Whiteman was a full-time designer working for CPS Interiors Ltd (“CPS”), an interior design company. Upon Ms Whiteman’s return from maternity leave she made a flexible working request on 5 March 2015 for the following: 1) that her hours be reduced; and 2) that she be allowed to work from home (with occasional visits to the office) and that she do most of her work after 6pm. CPS held a meeting between the managing director of the company and Ms Whiteman on 14 or 15 April 2015 in which the managing director was “cautiously receptive” of the idea of her working from home but subsequently rejected that idea by way of a letter (dated 1 June 2015). Ms Whiteman appealed that decision on 12 June 2015 but the appeal was rejected on 25 June 2015 by a health and safety consultant who was instructed to undertake the appeal (and whose employer had close ties to CPS). The basis of CPS’s rejection of the request that Ms Whiteman work from home was the following: 1) that its collaborative way of work meant that designers often had to work in the same room when working on technical designs; and 2) that designs were often changed at short notice, something which it would be difficult to deal with if Ms Whiteman was working at home only in the evenings.

After the rejection of her appeal Ms Whiteman resigned on 2 July 2015, giving as the reason for her resignation the rejection of the flexible working request. Subsequent to her resignation the managing director of CPS offered to investigate her complaints under the company’s grievance procedure and offered her a seven-day period within which she could retract her resignation. Ms Whiteman refused these offers on 16 July 2015 and brought an Employment Tribunal claim for breaches of the flexible working legislation, constructive dismissal, and indirect sex discrimination.

The case came to the Employment Tribunal earlier this year, with the Employment Tribunal rejecting all of Ms Whiteman’s claims. The Employment Tribunal found that CPS had not breached the flexible working legislation as it had dealt with her flexible working request reasonably and had made a reasonable decision in rejecting her request. Further, although CPS had taken longer than three months to deal with the flexible working request the Employment Tribunal held that she had consented to an extension of the three-month deadline by the fact that she had appealed the rejection of her request on 12 June 2015.  The Employment Tribunal also held that the constructive dismissal claim was not well-founded (as CPS’s response to her flexible working request had been “perfectly proper”) and that there had not been indirect discrimination (principally as Ms Whiteman had failed to present evidence that women are placed at a particular disadvantage by the practice of not allowing homeworking).

Chris Hadrill, a partner in the employment team at Redmans, commented on the case: “If a flexible working request is made by an employee then an employer must deal with that request in a reasonable manner within a three-month time period (unless the deadline for the responses is extended by agreement). However, employers must also be careful that they do not make decisions on flexible working requests that are discriminatory in nature, for example by implementing a practice, criterion or policy which places new mothers at a particular disadvantage compared to other categories of workers. In this case the Tribunal found that the employer had dealt with the flexible working request in a reasonable and fair manner.”

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees

Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk.

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago