Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In this post we’ll take a look at:
  1. What is constructive dismissal?
  2. What constitutes a breach of contract by your employer?
  3. Can a breach of contract be a series of cumulative actions or does it have to be a single incident?

1. What is constructive dismissal?

Constructive dismissal is, contrary to the relatively straightforward test for unfair dismissal, a curious mix of common law and statute. A “constructive dismissal” occurs when an employee resigns from their job because of their employer’s unreasonable conduct; effectively “turning” the resignation into a dismissal and enabling them to claim unfair (constructive) dismissal.

2. What constitutes a breach of contract by your employer?

Under s.95(1)(c) an employee may resign from their employment with or without notice but they must be entitled to do so as a result of their employer’s conduct. In determining whether an employee is entitled to resign one or other of two tests are commonly used:

  1. The traditional “contract” test; or
  2. The breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence test

The traditional contract test analyses the express terms of the contract of employment to determine what the contractual terms are and establish whether the employer is guilt of conduct which is a significant (or serious) breach of those terms. It is normally fairly easy to determine what the terms of the contract are if there exists a written contract of employment – what is more difficult is to determine whether the breach of a particular term (say, working hours) is sufficiently serious as to act as a repudiatory breach of the contract of employment by the employer and entitle an employee to resign. The mutual trust and confidence test relies on an examination of whether the actions of the employer are sufficiently serious as to destroy the mutual trust and confidence that previously existed between the parties.

The important element in both of these tests is therefore the meaning of what is sufficiently “serious” to justify an employee’s resignation. Both objective and subjective tests are used to determine whether certain actions (or a failure to take particular actions) are serious. A subjective test involves a look at how important the employee finds a particular action (let’s use the change of working hours again). If the employee thinks this is an extremely important term then it will be subjectively sufficiently serious to entitle the employee to resign. However, the objective seriousness of the action must also be considered – effectively whether the reasonable person would consider the change of working hours a sufficiently serious breach of contract to entitle the employee to resign.

We’ll now go on to take a look at whether a series of actions can cumulatively constitute a sufficiently serious breach of contract to entitle the employee to resign (for example, a series of unjustified disciplinaries over a number of years) or whether there normally has to be a single sufficiently serious action (such as the refusal to pay your wages).

3. Can a breach of contract be a series of cumulative actions or does it have to be a single incident?

An employer’s actions, as above, must be sufficiently serious to be significant and go “to the root of the contract”. The action can either be a single incident or the “last straw” in a series of incidents that had occurred. It will normally be fairly clear whether a single incident justifies an employee’s resignation. The effect of a series of incidents is, however, more unclear and we’ll take a look at this below.

In order for an incident to constitute the “last straw” in a series of incidents and entitle the employee to resign the quality of the incidents as a whole must demonstrate that the employer had indicated an intention to no longer be bound by the terms of the contract of employment. The final incident cannot be utterly trivial or entirely innocuous in nature. If an act is more than trivial, however, it can entitle the employee to resign and the employee can use previous actions by the employer (i.e. disciplinary actions which would otherwise be out of time) as evidence of sufficiently serious behaviour to constitute repudiatory breach of contract. These acts, though, must be of sufficiently serious quality in themselves to be potential breaches of contract – i.e. they can’t be trivial.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Tagged with →  

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.73 Average

92 Reviews

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 1 day ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 week ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 week ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 week ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 1 week ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 1 month ago