Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The case we are going to look at today (Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd) is one which involves the potentially tricky issue of when, whether and how a dismissal occurs. We’ll therefore look at the following four elements:

  1. The law relating to unfair dismissal
  2. The facts in Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd
  3. The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment
  4. Our thoughts on Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd

The law relating to unfair dismissal

Under s.94(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 employees possess the right not to be unfairly dismissed by their employer. Looked at crudely, the main issues that arise (although these are complicated in themselves, as the current case demonstrates) are:

  1. Did a dismissal occur (and if so, how and when)?
  2. Was this dismissal unfair (both procedurally and/or substantively)?

We’ll look at the first element today – when and how does a dismissal occur?

There are three broad ways in which a contract of employment can be terminated: termination by the employer, termination by the employee (resignation), and the end of a fixed-term contract. In most cases the fact of whether a dismissal has occurred is a relatively simple one – the employer either notifies the employee that they’re being (summarily) dismissed or the employee hands in their notice (or resigns without notice, depending on the circumstances).

However, if the intention to dismiss the employee or for the employee to resign is unclear then the Employment Tribunal must decide on the balance of probabilities whether a dismissal has actually occurred on the facts available to it. In cases involving ambiguous wording the words must be given the meaning that they would have in their normal workplace context.

This case addresses 3 issues relating to unfair dismissal:

  1. How was the dismissal alleged to have taken place?
  2. Did a dismissal take place?
  3. When did the dismissal take place?

The facts in Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd

The Claimant (the employee) commenced work with the Respondent (the employer) in November 2001. In January 2005 the Claimant sustained a serious injury at work which rendered him unable to carry out his previous duties. He was then absent from work on sick leave almost permanently.

The Claimant’s contract of employment stated that the Claimant must inform the Respondent of any change in address. In January 2006 the Claimant had been evicted from his previous residence and moved to a new accommodation. He did not inform the Respondent of this change in address.

On 28 June 2006 a letter was sent by the Respondent by recorded delivery to the Claimant’s previous address. This letter was returned. In the letter the Respondent requested whether the Claimant still wished to work for the Respondent. It further stated that if the Respondent did not hear from the Claimant by 5 July 2006 the Respondent would assume that the Claimant had resigned.

The Claimant (for obvious reasons) did not reply to the Respondent by 5 July 2006. However, he was notified by letter on 20 May 2009 by the Respondent’s solicitors in his claim for personal injury against his employer  that he had been treated as having been ‘self-dismissed’ on 5 July 2006. The Claimant subsequently submitted a claim for disability discrimination, breach of contract, and unfair dismissal on 28 July 2009.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment

The Employment Tribunal considered the above issues and arrived at the following conclusions:

  1. The Respondent was alleging that a “self-dismissal” had taken place. This is not possible under English employment law. If a Claimant is in repudiatory breach of his contract of employment then the employer must accept the breach and terminate the contract. The Respondent had not in this case communicated acceptance of the breach to the Claimant.
  2. Following on from the above, a dismissal did take place but not until the Claimant received the letter from the Respondent’s solicitors on 20 May 2009. The time limit for his unfair dismissal claim (leaving aside his disability discrimination claim) was therefore 19 August 2009.
  3. The Claimant had submitted his various claims on 28 July 2009. His claims were therefore within the prescribed time limit.

Our thoughts

This is an interesting look at the law relating to the dismissal and is also an illustration of when Employment Tribunal judges can make mistakes. The Claimant’s claim had previously been struck out at a Pre-Hearing Review as it was deemed to be outside the relevant time limits. The Employment Appeal Tribunal disagreed with this and stated that the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were within time and could therefore proceed.

Point to take away: if there is no actual communication of the acceptance of the repudiatory breach of contract then it does not terminate the contract of employment.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.73 Average

92 Reviews

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 1 day ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 week ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 week ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 week ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 1 week ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 1 month ago