The case we are going to look at today (Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd) is one which involves the potentially tricky issue of when, whether and how a dismissal occurs. We’ll therefore look at the following four elements:

  1. The law relating to unfair dismissal
  2. The facts in Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd
  3. The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment
  4. Our thoughts on Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd

The law relating to unfair dismissal

Under s.94(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 employees possess the right not to be unfairly dismissed by their employer. Looked at crudely, the main issues that arise (although these are complicated in themselves, as the current case demonstrates) are:

  1. Did a dismissal occur (and if so, how and when)?
  2. Was this dismissal unfair (both procedurally and/or substantively)?

We’ll look at the first element today – when and how does a dismissal occur?

There are three broad ways in which a contract of employment can be terminated: termination by the employer, termination by the employee (resignation), and the end of a fixed-term contract. In most cases the fact of whether a dismissal has occurred is a relatively simple one – the employer either notifies the employee that they’re being (summarily) dismissed or the employee hands in their notice (or resigns without notice, depending on the circumstances).

However, if the intention to dismiss the employee or for the employee to resign is unclear then the Employment Tribunal must decide on the balance of probabilities whether a dismissal has actually occurred on the facts available to it. In cases involving ambiguous wording the words must be given the meaning that they would have in their normal workplace context.

This case addresses 3 issues relating to unfair dismissal:

  1. How was the dismissal alleged to have taken place?
  2. Did a dismissal take place?
  3. When did the dismissal take place?

The facts in Zulhayir v JJ Food Service Ltd

The Claimant (the employee) commenced work with the Respondent (the employer) in November 2001. In January 2005 the Claimant sustained a serious injury at work which rendered him unable to carry out his previous duties. He was then absent from work on sick leave almost permanently.

The Claimant’s contract of employment stated that the Claimant must inform the Respondent of any change in address. In January 2006 the Claimant had been evicted from his previous residence and moved to a new accommodation. He did not inform the Respondent of this change in address.

On 28 June 2006 a letter was sent by the Respondent by recorded delivery to the Claimant’s previous address. This letter was returned. In the letter the Respondent requested whether the Claimant still wished to work for the Respondent. It further stated that if the Respondent did not hear from the Claimant by 5 July 2006 the Respondent would assume that the Claimant had resigned.

The Claimant (for obvious reasons) did not reply to the Respondent by 5 July 2006. However, he was notified by letter on 20 May 2009 by the Respondent’s solicitors in his claim for personal injury against his employer  that he had been treated as having been ‘self-dismissed’ on 5 July 2006. The Claimant subsequently submitted a claim for disability discrimination, breach of contract, and unfair dismissal on 28 July 2009.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment

The Employment Tribunal considered the above issues and arrived at the following conclusions:

  1. The Respondent was alleging that a “self-dismissal” had taken place. This is not possible under English employment law. If a Claimant is in repudiatory breach of his contract of employment then the employer must accept the breach and terminate the contract. The Respondent had not in this case communicated acceptance of the breach to the Claimant.
  2. Following on from the above, a dismissal did take place but not until the Claimant received the letter from the Respondent’s solicitors on 20 May 2009. The time limit for his unfair dismissal claim (leaving aside his disability discrimination claim) was therefore 19 August 2009.
  3. The Claimant had submitted his various claims on 28 July 2009. His claims were therefore within the prescribed time limit.

Our thoughts

This is an interesting look at the law relating to the dismissal and is also an illustration of when Employment Tribunal judges can make mistakes. The Claimant’s claim had previously been struck out at a Pre-Hearing Review as it was deemed to be outside the relevant time limits. The Employment Appeal Tribunal disagreed with this and stated that the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were within time and could therefore proceed.

Point to take away: if there is no actual communication of the acceptance of the repudiatory breach of contract then it does not terminate the contract of employment.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 
Testimonials

4.46 Average

13 Reviews

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 hour ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 hours ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 3 hours ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 3 hours ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 4 hours ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 4 hours ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 5 hours ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 4 days ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 6 days ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 1 week ago

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk