Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

redmans-blog-analysisIn the case of Smith v Renrod Ltd ET/1400166/2015 an Employment Tribunal held that a female employee had been sexually harassed by her line manager, even though the female employee engaged in the culture of ‘sexual banter’.

Ms Smith was employed as a sales executive at Renrod Ltd, a car dealership from 22 February 2013. In February 2014 Ms Smith alleged that she had been bullied at work by Mr Snowball, her line manager, and a meeting was held to discuss this. A mediation between Mr Snowball and Ms Smith was subsequently arranged, with this meeting taking place on 17 February 2014. This meeting appeared to have been successful and Ms Smith was encouraged to raise any further concerns that she had.

Following the mediation there was a breakdown in the relationship between Ms Smith and Mr Snowball in 2014, with Ms Smith alleging that she was being treated harshly by Mr Snowball and that he was continuing to bully her. One altercation between Ms Smith and Mr Snowball arose over Mr Snowball remonstrating with Ms Smith over the length of a lunch break she had taken, with Ms Smith allegedly responding to Mr Snowball that he would be going to prison over alleged criminal conduct on his part.

On 29 September 2016 Ms Smith raised a formal written grievance, detailing 42 examples of conduct (including sexual harassment) by Mr Snowball that she said had made her life intolerable at Renrod – these included:

  • That Mr Snowball had told her that he had not heard what she had said because he was “thinking about picking [her] up and fucking [her] on the desk;
  • That he was attempting to kiss her;
  • That he was pestering her about her private life; and
  • That he had made a comment that Ms Smith must be like “a wizard’s sleeve”

A grievance investigation was by Ms Shocklidge, a colleague of Ms Smith’s. Mr Snowball denied making the comments alleged and Ms Shocklidge concluded that the specific comments alleged by Ms Smith had not been made. Ms Shocklidge did, however, conclude that there was a culture of sexual banter in the workplace and that both Mr Snowball and Ms Smith were willing participants in that banter.

The outcome of the grievance process was that Ms Smith’ complaints of sexual harassment were not upheld. Ms Smith appealed against the outcome of her grievance but her appeal was rejected.

A disciplinary procedure was initiated in January 2015 against Ms Smith on allegations that she had engaged in sexual conduct in he workplace, that she had taken a smoke break without her consent and had threatened her manager, and that she had participated in sexual innuendo and bullied other staff members. This procedure resulted in Ms Smith being dismissed for gross misconduct on 6 February 2016 on the strength of the allegations that she had engaged in sexual activity on the business’ premises and in a company vehicle; Ms Smith had, however, already submitted her notice of resignation on 4 February 2015. Ms Smith appealed the decision to dismiss her for gross misconduct, an appeal meeting was held in her absence on 13 March 2015, and the appeal was dismissed on 10 April 2015.

Ms Smith brought Employment Tribunal claims for constructive dismissal, direct sex discrimination, sexual harassment, dismissal due to protected disclosure (or ‘whistleblowing’), and breach of contract against Renrod Ltd.

The Employment Tribunal dismissed all of Ms Smith’s claims except for her claim for sexual harassment, which it upheld – this finding was made based on a text message that Ms Smith submitted during the Employment Tribunal (but had not made available during the grievance process with her employer) that evidenced that Mr Snowball had made the “fucking on the desk” comment in 2014. The Tribunal came to this conclusion despite a finding that Ms Smith had participated in and even initiated sexual banter in the workplace, as it found that, given car dealership was a male-dominated industry, it would have been difficult for Ms Smith not to feel compelled to participate in (and not obviously take offence at) language and conduct which was nevertheless demeaning and insulting.

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “One of the crucial issues in a claim for sexual harassment was whether any alleged sexual harassment was ‘unwanted’ or not – if a respondent can show that an employee who is claiming sexual harassment participated in or initiated sexual conduct in the workplace then this can be damaging to the prospects of success of a claim for sexual harassment. However, what this case shows is that the Tribunal will take into account the context of the industry that the claimant is working in when determining whether sexual conduct was ‘unwanted’ or not.”

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees

Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk.

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago