Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The facts in Slater v Wimmer

Mr Wimmer (“the Defendant”) took part in the ‘first’ tandem skydive over Everest in 2008. He wanted to film the skydive so that he could produce two films that would be broadcast – one of such films to be broadcast in Denmark (where he is apparently a celebrity) and the other to be broadcast outside of Denmark. Mr Slater (“the Claimant”) was commissioned to film footage for the broadcast outside of Denmark. He was not paid a salary for this work but agreed to film the event on the basis that his expenses would be paid. The event took place but there was a subsequent dispute as to the ownership of the copyright in the film footage that Mr Slater had sent to Mr Wimmer when Mr Slater discovered that a documentary called “Wimmer Over Everest” had been broadcast in Denmark. Mr Slater believed that Mr Wimmer had used approximately two minutes of his footage in this documentary and sent an invoice for £3,000 to Mr Wimmer for use of the footage. Mr Wimmer in return claimed (principally) that he owned the intellectual property rights to the footage. A claim was subsequently issued in the Patents County Court by the Claimant and Mr Wimmer counter-claimed on a variety of points.

The law relating to Slater v Wimmer

This is essentially a dispute relating to ownership of copyright. Mr Wimmer believed that he had commissioned Mr Slater to film the footage on the basis that Mr Wimmer would own all the IP rights. Mr Slater believed otherwise. Two issues therefore had to be addressed:

  1. Was there a contract between Mr Slater and Mr Wimmer and, if so, what were the terms of the contract?
  2. Which person(s) were the principal directors and/or producers of the film footage? (under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988)

The Patent County Court’s decision in Slater v Wimmer

Judge Birss QC considered that there was a contract for services between Mr Slater and Mr Wimmer. This was not an employee – employer relationship but Mr Wimmer had commissioned Mr Slater’s services as a cameraman for the consideration of paying his expenses. Judge Birss further found that there were no express terms in the contract relating to the ownership of the IP rights of the footage. The implied terms would therefore determine ownership.

Judge Birss considered that under s.10(1A) of the CPDA 1988 that both Mr Wimmer and Mr Slater were joint owners of the film footage – Mr Wimmer being the “producer” and Mr Slater the “principal director”. Judge Birss further found that there were no implied terms in the contact for services relating to the ownership of copyright as the situation was covered under the CPDA 1988 and Mr Slater had not been paid to film the footage – only his expenses were covered. He rejected arguments from the Defendant’s representatives that the absence of implied terms would make the exploitation of IP rights commercially unfeasible and that Mr Wimmer would lack rights against third parties. Both parties therefore jointly owned copyright to the footage in question.

Our thoughts

This case emphasises how quickly business relationships can deteriorate and how important it is to reach express written agreement regarding crucial issues such as ownership of intellectual property rights in such circumstances. Ensure that meetings are recorded in an appropriate medium and that there is no confusion as to the terms of an agreement.

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago