Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case concerns allegations of (time-barred) professional negligence and breach of contract by a firm of solicitors in the 1980’s, and attempts by the Claimants to circumvent the limitation dates by pleading their case on the basis of fraud or breach of fiduciary duty (an approach that got short shrift).

The facts in Seaton & Ors v Seddon & Ors

Musical Youth (of which there were five members) were a successful reggae band in the 1980’s. They released an extremely successful song called “Pass the Dutchie” in 1983 and broke up shortly afterwards. “Pass the Dutchie” was accepted to have been a cover of a Mighty Diamonds song called “Pass the Kouchie”, which was itself apparently derived from  a song by Jackie Mittoo called “Full Up”. However, it was established that Musical Youth’s “Pass the Dutchie” had sufficient originality to qualify for copyright protection under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Mr Seddon (a partner in “Woolf Seddon”) acted as legal representatives on Musical Youth’s behalf, their retainer being signed with Musical Youth in 1982. A dispute arose in 1984 concerning who was to be credited for “Pass the Dutchie” and Woolf Seddon investigated. The rights holder for “Pass the Kouchie” in Europe were found to be two companies (“Peter A” and “Peter B”), who wished to issue proceedings against an American company (“Sparta Florida”) with the intention that “Pass the Dutchie” should be solely credited to “Peter A” and “Peter B” (“the two Peters”), not “Sparta Florida”. Woolf Seddon agreed to represent the two Peters on this basis and reached an agreement with Sparta Florida later that year (“the Sparta Florida Agreement”), an agreement that split the proceeds of royalties for “Pass the Dutchie” half and half between the two Peters, the monies for the two Peters to be received into Woolf Seddon’s client account. This was apparently on the basis that Woolf Seddon believed that copyright for “Pass the Dutchie” would not be owned by Musical Youth but by the party that owned the copyright in “Pass the Kouchie”.

Mr Seaton, one of the members of Musical Youth, later discovered the existence of this agreement and suspected that he may have not been paid royalties in “Pass the Dutchie” that he was entitled to. He therefore issued claims against Woolf Seddon (among others) on the basis that there was fundamental conflict of interest in Mr Seddon acting for both Musical Youth and the two Peters. Further, he was in breach of contract for failing to advise Musical Youth on their entitlement to copyright in “Pass the Dutchie” and had failed to account for and represent the interests of Musical Youth in the Sparta Florida Agreement. This would generally give rise to claims of professional negligence and breach of contract but for the fact that these claims would have long passed their limitation dates. The Claimants therefore sought to advance their case on the basis of fraudulent breach of fiduciary trust and making false representations.

The Claimants issued their claim in 2010. Woolf Seddon applied for summary judgment in the claim against them on the grounds that there was no legal basis for the existing claims and any other claims were time-barred.

The law relating to professional negligence and breach of contract

A professional adviser can face a claim based on his work through various means:

  • Breach of contract
  • Breach of duty of care (tort of negligence)
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Breach of statutory duty

Generally, professional advisers will have a contract (also known as a “retainer”) with their clients. This is, in effect, a contract of employment and outlines the rights and duties of each party – the professional adviser and the client. Whether there has been a breach of contract will entail an examination of the express and implied terms of the contract.

However, there may be liability in tort for professional negligence as well as contract. Generally, both grounds (if they are within their respective limitation periods) are pleaded rather than in the alternative. Professional negligence would occur if the professional adviser breached their duty of care to their client by undertaking (or failing to undertake) certain actions. The standard of care expected is a relatively complicated issue and will not be covered in this article.

The limitation period for both contractual and tortious actions (in the main) is six years from the date of which the cause of action occurs.

The High Court’s judgment in Seaton & Ors v Seddon & Ors

The High Court gave summary judgment to Woolf Seddon on the basis that it believed that the current proceedings were an attempt to transform a claim for professional negligence and breach of contract into fraud or dishonest breach of trust to avoid the problem that the claims were outside of their limitation date. The High Court further refused the Claimants permission to amend their Particulars of Claim to provide further particulars of the fraud allegedly committed by Woolf Seddon.

Our specialist dispute resolution & litigation solicitors’ views on Seaton & Ors v Seddon & Ors

This is an extremely complicated claim, arising from allegations of professional negligence and breach of contract committed by a firm of solicitors in the 1980s. Clients of professional advisers should be aware that there is a limitation on claims for professional negligence and breach of contract (if they don’t involve breach of fiduciary duty) and should be vigilant in determining whether their professional adviser has breached their duty of care towards them – or contract with them. Otherwise clients may find that they cannot pursue a remedy even though actionable loss has occurred.

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago