Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case concerns without prejudice communications and the ability to admit such communications as evidence in the Employment Tribunal.

The facts in Roberts v ALDI Stores Ltd

Mr Roberts (“the Claimant”) commenced employment with Aldi Stores Ltd (“the Respondent”) on 3 July 2006 as store manager at their Llandrindod store. His employment was terminated by the Respondent on 31 March 2010 and the Claimant submitted complaints for unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, accrued but untaken holiday pay, failure to give written reasons for his dismissal, and complaints under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The Respondent conceded that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed two days before the Employment Tribunal hearing and the hearing proceeded on a remedy only basis. The Employment Judge sitting on the case awarded the Claimant £10,051 for his unfair dismissal claim but failed to consider his other complaints, including his claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay, failure to provide written reasons, and his claims under the Working Time Regulations. Further, the Claimant was aggrieved that the Employment Judge had taken into account without prejudice discussions which had taken place prior to the Employment Tribunal hearing and had only extended his compensatory award to 1 July 2010 because of the fact that he had taken such evidence into account.

The law relating to without prejudice communications in the Employment Tribunal

The without prejudice rule generally prevents written or oral statements made in a genuine attempt to settle a claim (whether pre-action or during proceedings) from being as used in evidence in proceedings against the party that made any admission. This is generally a blanket rule and is based upon either an implied contractual term or on a public policy basis. Although a statement which is made on a without prejudice basis is not generally admissible in the Employment Tribunal, such a communication can be admitted as evidence if both parties consent to such. The reason for having such a rule is to encourage parties to settle their claim.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Roberts v ALDI Stores Ltd

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the Claimant’s appeal on the admissibility of the without prejudice meeting and further upheld his appeal that the Employment Judge had failed to deal with certain aspects of his claim, such as the Working Time Regulations claim, the failure to provide written reasons for dismissal, and the failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay. However, the Claimant conceded that his claim for notice pay was covered by the basic award that had been awarded by the Employment Judge in the remedy hearing.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ thoughts on Roberts v ALDI Stores Ltd

If you engage with another party on a without prejudice basis then make sure that the meeting, letter or telephone discussion is stated to be on a without prejudice basis (and that such statement is recorded). Failure to do so (this is a fairly obvious point) could (and almost did in this case) severely prejudice your case, whether you’re submitting an employment law complaint or defending one.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog.

Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago