Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In today’s post we’re going to look at an issue which has received quite a lot of “air time” in the press recently – protected disclosures, confidentiality (or – as they’ve been termed – “gagging clauses”) and compromise agreements. We’ll have a brief look at the various issues involved, in particular by examining:

  1. What is a compromise agreement?
  2. What is a protected disclosure?
  3. Why all the fuss recently about protected disclosures and compromise agreements?
  4. Doesn’t s.43j of the Employment Rights Act 1996 cover this?

What is a compromise agreement?

First off, a definition of a “compromise agreement”. A compromise agreement is a contract which is regulated by statute. This contract allows for the settling of Employment Tribunal proceedings and/or waiving the employee’s rights to make a claim to the Employment Tribunal in return for the receipt of some benefit to the employee. This benefit can be financial such as a sum of money) and/or non-financial (such as the promise to give an agreed reference to a future employer). There are specific rules regarding what constitutes a valid compromise agreement but we won’t cover these here.

What is a protected disclosure?

Under the ERA 1996 an employee has the right not to be dismissed or subjected to a detriment because they’ve made a protected disclosure. A “protected disclosure” is defined by s.43 of the Act – it is:

  • The disclosure of information which (in the reasonable belief of the worker) shows that one of the following has been, is being or is likely to be committed: a criminal offence, a failure to comply with a legal obligation, a miscarriage of justice, the endangering of the health or safety of any individual or the damaging of the environment;
  • Disclosed to the employer or some other responsible person, a lawyer or a Minister of the Crown; and
  • Made in good faith, with reasonable belief that the information is substantially true and is not for reasons connected to personal gain

Why all the fuss recently about protected disclosures and compromise agreements?

The recent media coverage of compromise agreements and “gagging orders” (more commonly referred to as confidentiality clauses) was spurred by Gary Walker (A former NHS Trust chief executive) breaking cover last week regarding a compromise agreement he had signed in April 2011 which stopped him from disclosing information relating to his employment with his employer’s consent. This, he stated, meant that he wasn’t allowed to disclose information to the media regarding potential malpractice at the NHS Trust that he worked for. Stephen Dorrell then weighed into the dispute, writing to Jeremy Hunt (current Health Secretary) that confidentiality clauses shouldn’t stop employees from highlighting patient safety concerns. Mr Hunt, in return, responded by confirming the same.

Doesn’t s.43j of the Employment Rights Act 1996 cover this?

In light of the above, it would be expected that there had been a legislative oversight regarding the potential for employers to stop employees making protected disclosures after a compromise agreement has been signed. But has there? S.43j of the Employment Rights Act 1996 would suggest not. Under s.43j:

(1) Any provision in an agreement to which this section applies is void in so far as it purports to preclude the worker from making a protected disclosure.

(2)This section applies to any agreement between a worker and his employer (whether a worker’s contract or not), including an agreement to refrain from instituting or continuing any proceedings under this Act or any proceedings for breach of contract.

There does not therefore seem to be any bar to a “worker” making a protected disclosure regarding their termination – any provision attempting to stop the worker doing so is void and unenforceable. The only unfortunate part of this is that “worker” isn’t defined under the Act – there’s some ambiguity as to whether an ex-employee can still be a “worker”. This would therefore mean that if an employee had signed a compromise agreement (that hadn’t resulted in the termination of their employment) and subsequently made a protected disclosure then their position would be protected. Again, the only sticking point is as to whether a former employee enjoys the same protection. Storm in a teacup, anyone?

Redmans Solicitors offer expert legal advice from employment law solicitors and settlement agreement solicitors.

logo_website

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.73 Average

92 Reviews

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 2 days ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 week ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 week ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 week ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 1 week ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 2 months ago