Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In our continuing look at types of primary copyright infringement, we’re today going to look at the offence of issuing copies of copyrighted work to the public under s.18(1) of the Copyright Design and Patent Act 1998 (“CDPA 98”).

The prohibition against issuing copies of copyrighted work to the public applies to every description of copyrighted work. We’ve explored the types of copyrighted work before so in this post we’ll deconstruct this prohibition by considering the different elements of the infringement:

  1. Issuing
  2. Copies
  3. (To ) the public

Issuing

The issue of copies (see below) must take place in an area where the Copyright Design and Patent Act 1998 applies. This refers to the time and place that the reproductions were put on offer, not the point at which a copy of the copyrighted work was issued to the public. However, in particular circumstances infringement of the owner’s right will occur at the time of arrival (i.e. the “CD-WOW” case).

Copies

To infringe against the copyright owner’s right, the infringer must put unauthorised “primary” copies of the work into circulation. As can be seen by the emphasis in the previous sentence there is a distinction between “primary” and “secondary” distribution. To use the example of the distribution of copies of an author’s books, primary distribution occurs when the author licenses a publisher to distribute copies of his work. Secondary distribution occurs when, for example, a second-hand book seller sells a copy of an already-distributed work. The book-seller would not need to obtain a license to sell the book and would therefore not infringe copyright by distributing copies of the book. However, an unauthorised primary distributor would infringe the copyright owner’s rights by distributing without consent.

Indeed, if the copyrighted work is distributed in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) then infringement occurs if the copies were not previously put into circulation in the EEA by or with the consent of the copyright owner. If the copyright work is distributed outside of the EEA then infringement occurs if copies of the work were not previously put into circulation in the EEA or elsewhere.

The public

According to the definition of this infringement, the copyrighted work must be issued to the public for the infringement to occur. To determine whether the copyrighted work is being issued to the pubic the following questions must be asked:

  1. Is the issuing of the copyrighted work for profit?
  2. Is the audience unrestricted?

If the answer to both of the above questions is “yes” then the audience will be defined as “public” and infringement may therefore have occurred. An example may be useful here. The issuing of a dance CD at a private house party (with restricted access based upon ties of friendship) would usually not be for profit (the friends wouldn’t pay to get in) and would be restricted (as only those who qualify as friends could attend). There wouldn’t usually be an infringement in these circumstances. However, the issuing of the same CD in a club environment probably would constitute primary infringement. The CD is being used for the attainment of profit (people paying to get into the club) and the audience is unrestricted (in theory).

Conclusion

As can be seen from the above, this type of primary infringement isn’t simple (although it isn’t particularly complex). Whether the infringement of issuing copies to the public has occurred depends upon the particular facts of the case.

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago