Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Niekrash v South London Healthcare NHS Trust is a “whistleblowing” claim in the Employment Tribunal which has been appealed by the Claimant on the point of remedy – specifically because he was not awarded aggravated damages by the Employment Tribunal.

The facts in Niekrash v South London Healthcare NHS Trust

Mr Niekrash (“the Claimant”) commenced employment as a consultant urologist with the Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust in January 2000. During the course of his employment he was promoted to “lead urologist” and was described as an excellent clinician.

Between 2002 and 2008 the Claimant started to complain to management at his successor employer, the South London Healthcare NHS Trust, about the provision of urological services, particularly relating to cancer.  The employees handling the management of the services, Dr Power and Ms Weichart, were offended by the “forceful” language the Claimant used and an investigation was started into the Claimant’s behaviour on 9 April 2008. The Claimant was “excluded” under the Respondent’s relevant procedure and an investigation was undertaken, concluding on 5 June 2008. The Claimant was then reinstated.

The Claimant subsequently submitted a “whistleblowing” claim to the Employment Tribunal, asserting that he had suffered the detriment of being excluded from his employment and that he had suffered stress and lost private practice income as a result of this.

The Employment Tribunal found in the Claimant’s favour and awarded Mr Niekrash £15,000 for non-financial losses (damage to health and damage to reputation) and £2,568 for financial losses. The Tribunal declined to make an award of aggravated damages. The Claimant appealed against this.

The law relating to aggravated damages in “whistleblowing” claims

In whistleblowing cases compensation (unlike “ordinary” unfair dismissal cases) is not capped. Workers (and employees) can be awarded damages for both non-financial (injury to feelings, loss of reputation, personal injury) and financial (loss of past and future earnings).

Aggravated damages can be awarded in addition to injury to feelings in whistleblowing claims. However, such awards are rare in practice. They are awarded in only the most serious cases where the behaviour of the other party has aggravated the Claimant’s non-financial loss and are normally awarded where the Claimant can demonstrate that there has been “high-handed, malicious, insulting or oppressive” conduct on the behalf of the Respondent. Intention is an important factor.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment in Niekrash v South London Healthcare NHS Trust

The Employment Appeal Tribunal rejected the Claimant’s argument that he should have been awarded aggravated damages for the conduct of the Respondent. The Employment Appeal Tribunal considered that a clear argument for the awarding of aggravated damages had not been made out by the Claimant at the Employment Tribunal and that the Employment Tribunal was not obligated to trawl through the evidence to substantiate an award of aggravated damages. In particular, the Claimant did not demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the Respondent’s behaviour was malicious, high-handed, insulting or oppressive.

Our thoughts

The case of Niekrash v South London Healthcare NHS Trust demonstrates  that it is important to get the Schedule of Loss correct “first time round” and to plead all points relating to remedy at the Employment Tribunal. Failure to do so may mean that the Tribunal will fail to deal with these points. Further, as is clear in this case, the Tribunal is not obligated to “trawl” through the evidence before it to determine whether the test for aggravated damages (and, on a wider level, other areas related to remedy) has been met.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog.

Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 1 month ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 1 month ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 1 month ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago