Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Kuteh v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust ET/2302764/2016 the Employment Tribunal held that a nurse was fairly dismissed on allegations that she had engaged in inappropriate discussions with patients regarding religion.

The background facts in Kuteh v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust

Ms Kuteh, who is a committed, Christian, commenced her employment with the Trust as a registered nurse on 1 April 2017 and was promoted to the position of ‘Sister’ in 2012. In November 2015 she was transferred to a pre-assessment role which involved carrying out between six and twelve pre-assessment checks on patients who were due to undergo surgery. A standard checklist was used to carry out these checks, and this form included questions on the religion of the patient.

In March and April 2016 Ms Kuteh’s manager, Ms Putland, was informed that patients had complained to staff in the department that Ms Kuteh had been raising issues of religion and faith with them when going through the pre-assessment checks. In total, five patients complained in March and April 2016, and their complaints included that Ms Kuteh had “preached” to them and that one patient had been informed that if he prayed to God he would have a better chance of survival from surgery for cancer. Ms Putland informed the matron, Ms Gill, and on 11 April 2016 Ms Gill told Ms Kuteh that discussions with patients regarding their religion were inappropriate and should not take place in the future. Ms Kuteh assured Ms Gill that she would not discuss religion further with patients. However, two further complaints of a similar nature were made by patients in May 2016. Ms Gill was informed of these complaints and a disciplinary investigation meeting was arranged to take place. In the meantime, a further complaint was made by a patient on 20 June 2016 that Ms Kuteh had discussed religion with him.

On 30 June 2016 a meeting took place between the appointed investigator, Ms Shepherd, and Ms Kuteh. In that meeting Ms Kuteh accepted that she was aware that she had been instructed not to discuss religion with patients but that she felt that such an instruction was unreasonable, but she accepted that she could see how some patients may find discussions regarding religion to be inappropriate and admitted failing to follow reasonable management instructions. In her report Ms Shepherd recommended that the matter be progressed to a disciplinary hearing.

A disciplinary hearing took place in August 2016 and, by way of a letter dated 18 August 2016, Ms Kuteh was dismissed for failing to follow Ms Gill’s reasonable management instruction in April 2016, inappropriate conduct in discussing the topic of religion with patients, and breaching the nursing and midwifery code in expressing her personal beliefs to people in an inappropriate way. Ms Kuteh appealed that decision, with one of the grounds of appeal having been that she had not been given copies of the notes of the evidence of the patients who had complained. Ms Kuteh was not given permission to  but her appeal was dismissed.

Ms Kuteh brought a claim to the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and, further, for a finding that her human rights had been breached (namely the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights).

The Employment Tribunal’s decision

The Employment Tribunal found that Ms Kuteh’s dismissal had been fair, as there had been a fair investigation into serious allegations and that there had been a fair hearing. The Tribunal also found that there was no necessity for Ms Shepherd to have interviewed, for the purposes of the disciplinary hearing, the patients who had complained and that there was no obligation for Ms Kuteh to have been provided with copies of the patients’ complaints. The Tribunal also found that the dismissing officer held an honest belief on reasonable grounds that Ms Kueth was guilty of the charges, and that the dismissal was therefore in the range of reasonable responses.

Our lawyers’ comments on the case

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case shows that employees should be careful when expressing personal opinions relating to religious or philosophical beliefs in the workplace – in some circumstances such personal opinions may be protected under discrimination legislation but, in other circumstances, as in this case, such expressions of personal opinion may lead to dismissal.”

The judgment of the Employment Tribunal in the case of Kuteh v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.63 Average

30 Reviews

Anonymous

Immediate response to my initial enquiry. Very clear throughout the whole process and thorough and great communication which worked really well during quite a stressful time. Chris Hadrill was extremely helpful and made me feel at ease.

Posted 2 months ago

Nick D

I received a very professional service from Chris. The advice given really helped to leave me comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. Would be happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service from initial contact to deliverables.

Posted 3 months ago

Virginia K

Yes, Chris Hadrill answered all my questions and I feel more confident with my current situation

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill was referred to me my a friend of mine. I found the service to be efficient, quick and like Chris's direct approach to my work. Well done and thank you Chris!

Posted 3 months ago

Andy W

Very prompt & structured service that helped put my mind at rest at a difficult time

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

I have found Redmans to be very helpful, diligant and thoroughly professional when dealing with them, plus they gone that extra mile for me !

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Thank you to Chris Hadrill at Redmans for his assistance in settling my case. I contacted him at the very last minute and he was happy to help me and managed to get everything done on time and in a very professional manner. I will definitely be happy to work with him again .

Posted 3 months ago

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 7 months ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 7 months ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 7 months ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 8 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 8 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 8 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 8 months ago