Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Employment Tribunal finds employee was harassed based on protected ground of sexual orientation but was not victimised.  

In the Employment Tribunal case of Mr A Smith v Saxton 4 x 4 Ltd: 3200695/2018, the Claimant brought complaints of harassment related to sexual orientation and/or victimisation. The Respondent defended the complaints on grounds that the claim was presented out of time and also on its merits. The Claimant alleged that he was subjected to homophobic abuse and unwelcome comments about his sexual orientation by a number of employees over a period from 30 May to 6 June 2015, that he raised a grievance about this conduct which was investigated in a manner which was not fair and which then resulted in him facing disciplinary action as the alleged instigator of inappropriate sexual comment and conduct in the workplace which led him to resign. The Respondent’s case was that the Claimant raised a complaint about inoffensive language related to sexuality, that it was investigated extensively but was not upheld; its case was that in the course of investigation it became aware of the alleged misconduct of the Claimant, it instigated a disciplinary hearing which the Claimant did not attend following which he was summarily dismissed on 3 September 2015.

The facts in Mr A Smith v Saxton 4 x 4 Ltd

The Respondent was a family owned business selling high end second-hand vehicles to the general public and employing between 80 and 100 staff in its showrooms in Chelmsford. The Claimant was employed for 15 months as trainee Business Manager. His employment ended, either on 17th August as the Claimant resigned, or on 4th September 2015 for alleged gross misconduct.

The Claimant’s account was that he was a very private person and while he never denied his sexual orientation, he did not always volunteer it. The Tribunal found that some of the staff within the Respondent’s work environment used swear words and sexual innuendo in the form of “banter”.

The main incident occurred on 30 May. On the Claimant’s account, Mr. Cliff Traylor shouted across the office to him asking to get a customer quote immediately. The Claimant objected to being shouted at in this way and went into the sales office closing the glass doors behind him. The exchange became heated, the Claimant told Mr. Traylor he was being rude and called Mr. Traylor “a twat” to which Mr. Traylor responded by calling the Claimant “a dick”.

What happened next was disputed. The Claimant’s account was that as he started making his way out of the office area, he heard Mr. Traylor call him a faggot, cock sucking prick and gay twat. He believed that everybody in the office area heard this abuse as the doors were still closing.

The stress of this event and other subsequent events, caused the Claimant to take a day off in June and he was requested by the Respondent to attend a meeting to explain why he had done this. Following this, the Respondent started an investigation into the events alleged by the Claimant, but the Claimant considered that the process felt like a disciplinary. He raised a grievance. In the investigation, the Respondent found evidence that Mr Traylor had spoken to the Claimant in the way he claimed and gave him a written warning; however the Respondent also found that the Claimant had used sexual innuendoes in the workplace on previous occasions; his grievance was not upheld; he appealed but failed. He was then invited to a disciplinary to discuss the behaviour that had been uncovered. The Claimant resigned but as he did not attend this or a further meeting, the Respondent dismissed him. 

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had proved facts from which they could infer discrimination and so the burden of proof shifted to the Respondent.

The Tribunal determined that on 30 May Mr. Traylor did not use the words of which he was accused, but that on 5 June Mr. Traylor did call the Claimant ”a fucking liar” (although this was not related to sexual orientation).

However, the Tribunal found that other comments made by other employees such as teasing the Claimant for being feminine in his mannerisms and calling him gay were made and that these were intended to mock the Claimant based on his sexual orientation. In relation to three incidents, the Tribunal did find that other employees’ conduct was related to the Claimant’s sexual orientation and it did have the purpose or effect of violating the Claimant’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. The Tribunal found that, particularly as the Respondent had not carried out any training of its staff on equality issues, that the Respondent was liable for these acts.

The Tribunal did not uphold the Claimant’s victimisation argument: the Tribunal found that the Respondent’s failure to uphold the grievance was justified because of the evidence that they gathered and was not a response to the grievance having been raised and that the decision to commence disciplinary action was appropriate given the evidence that was uncovered. They also found that the Claimant’s appeal was dealt with adequately and that there was no delay or failure to consider the complaint fairly and neutrally. The Claimant’s appeal against the grievance outcome was not upheld because the Claimant did not produce any new evidence.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mr A Smith v Saxton 4 x 4 Ltd

Caroline Lewis, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “Harassment because of sexual orientation can take many different forms. It could be a verbal or written comment, what somebody thinks is a ‘joke’, exclusion from conversations or activities, violence or the threat of violence.

An employee’s complaint of this nature should be taken seriously, and the employer should take care to listen to their concerns. It should also be mindful that this type of complaint can be difficult for the individual to discuss.

It is important for an employer to deal with this type of complaint, not only because of its legal obligations, but also because there could be knock-on effects. The employee being harassed might feel de-motivated and their productivity fall, or it might lead to them being absent from work through stress. A climate of harassment can also damage morale in the workplace.

An employer may benefit from having a specific policy setting out how it would deal with complaints about sexual orientation discrimination and ensuring that staff are fully trained on this.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr A Smith v Saxton 4 x 4 Ltd: 3200695/2018 can be found here

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

124 Reviews

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 2 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 3 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 4 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 4 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 4 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 4 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris was absolutely excellent. Clear and concise, offering sound advice.

Posted 4 months ago

Tim O

Experienced and competent advisors

Posted 4 months ago

Rachel A

Quick and expert assistance. I would highly recommend Chris for any of your legal needs.

Posted 4 months ago

Joe S

I was very happy with the service provided by Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. I felt very comfortable discussing all matters with Chris and am very grateful for all the help and guidance I was given throughout the whole process. I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to friends and family!

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

I had a very good experience working with Chris Hadrill during a difficult and emotional time. This held true from the moment I spoke to him on the phone, to the end of the process. Overall, he was attentive, professional and highly supportive. He provided sound advice and clarity. It was the reviews that led me to Redmans! I was very happy to know they were all true. I highly recommend working with Redmans Solicitors. Thank-you to the entire team!

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Good service

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service. Highly recommend.

Posted 4 months ago

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 5 months ago