Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The facts in Growcott v Glaze Auto Parts Ltd

Mrs Growcott (“the Claimant”) was employed by Glaze Auto Parts Ltd (“the Respondent”). She was employed as a delivery driver by the Respondent. On 18 December 2009 it was alleged that she had used foul and abusive language towards the employees of a major customer of the Respondent. She was investigated, attended a disciplinary hearing, and was dismissed for gross misconduct. She appealed but her appeal was dismissed.

The Claimant subsequently submitted an ET1 claim for unfair dismissal. She believed that the disciplinary process was unfair because the two men who had made the allegations against her had not been called at the disciplinary hearing to give live evidence.

The Respondent warned the Claimant by letter on 14 June 2010 that the claim was misconceived and that her claim did not have a reasonable prospect of success. The letter was a thoughtful, reasonable one and concisely set out the law for the Claimant, reaching the conclusion that her claim was misconceived. The Claimant, however, continued to pursue the matter past this date.

At the Employment Tribunal the Claimant failed in her claim for unfair dismissal. The Respondent applied for costs at the Tribunal on the basis that the claim was initially misconceived and, further, that it was unreasonable for the Claimant to have pursued the claim past 14 June 2010. The Employment Tribunal allowed the application for costs and ordered the Claimant to pay £1,972.50 in costs. The Claimant appealed this.

The law relating to costs in the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal has the power to make costs orders under the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (“ET Rules”), which are contained within the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (“ET Regulations”).

Costs are the exception, not the rule, in the Employment Tribunal. Under rules 40(2) and (3) of the ET Rules the Tribunal has the power to award costs if one of the party’s to the proceedings has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively, or otherwise unreasonably, or that the bringing or conducting of the claim has been misconceived. If the Tribunal determines that the conduct falls within this ambit then it must decide whether to exercise its discretion to award costs in that instance. Again, the hurdle to costs being awarded in both instances is high.

Application of the facts to the law

The Respondent applied for costs on the basis that the Claimant’s claim was misconceived from the start and, secondly, it was misconceived and unreasonable from the date of its letter to her in June 2010. The Employment Tribunal found that the Claimant’s conduct had been misconceived at least from the date of the letter.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Growcott v Glaze Auto Parts Ltd

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the Employment Tribunal’s decision. It deemed that the awarding of costs was within the Employment Tribunal’s discretion and that there had been no error of law in applying its power to award costs.

Our thoughts on Growcott v Glaze Auto Parts Ltd

Cost awards are unusual in the Employment Tribunal and are awarded in less than 1% of cases. However, Claimants (and Respondents) should always be aware of the risk of costs and should obtain specialist legal advice to determine whether the bringing, conducting or defending of the claim may trigger the Employment Tribunal’s power to award costs. Further points are listed below.

  • Claimant solicitors must be wary if their clients are too over-zealous in their approach to their claim. Although the issue of employment law (and the claims that emanate from employment contexts) can be emotive ones, it is important that the Claimant recognises at an early stage that their claim may fail and that they should be reasonable in their approach to it.
  • Claimants must bear in mind that if their claim does not appear to have reasonable prospects of success then they should be wary of pursuing the claim, especially if they have been warned that an application for costs may be made.
  • It is unclear whether the Claimant was represented in this matter. If she wasn’t, then it may be unfair on the Claimant – who is not expert in the law – to penalise her. The Respondent had greater resources at its disposal and it is not inconceivable that the Respondent’s solicitors may try to put Claimant’s off by threatening them with an application for costs.
  • Witnesses who are not employees of the Respondent cannot be compelled to attend disciplinary hearings or give any form of evidence. Failure to present such evidence by the Respondent may not necessarily therefore be unfair to the Claimant. However, failure to even attempt to canvas their views may constitute unfairness.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.62 Average

53 Reviews

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 3 days ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 5 days ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 5 days ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

They are busy people but manage well so generally I would recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very efficient and professional service from my first phone call making an enquiry. Timescales of the matter in hand were met and within the agreed budget. Would highly recommend Redmans

Posted 3 weeks ago

Lisa B

Really very good service, always available to answer questions, provide my with any information I needed to make informed decisions.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Offered good support and advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris reviewed and managed my compromise agreement swiftly, accurately, helpfully, and on budget. His input on key non-compete clauses was valuable, his communications were clear and concise, and he was always swift in responding. Highly recommended.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Gurbir C

Excellent legal advice service.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Tim

I found Redmans to be very helpful and efficient in conducting my case which was concluded in a timely and diligent manner

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Redman Solicitors to be very good and worked very well to an extremely tight timescale. I would happily recommend them again especially Rana.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

I received excellent, knowledgeable and critically timely support from Chris regarding my settlement agreement, and would wholeheartedly recommend Chris in these matters.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Katelyn

The solicitor communicated well with me and made sure I understood everything. He did everything needed for my settlement agreement and tried to get the wording changed in my favour too.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Redmans provided excellent services

Posted 4 weeks ago

Sibel U

Excellent service

Posted 4 weeks ago

Peter S

I was very happy with the level of advise I received from Caroline Lewis, and a very professional service fron Chris, The advice given really helped me and I was comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. I would be more than happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Derek S

I very much appreciated the help provided by Redmans in the settlement agreement agreed with my former employer.

Posted 1 month ago

Waseem M

It was the first ime I used Redmans Solicitors and to be honest, thety were amazing. Rana Tandon and Chris Hadrill were out of this world. They made the process as simply and smooth as can be. Thank you so much for all your support over the last week.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Worked very quickly considering right deadlines - and gave great advice

Posted 1 month ago