Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The facts in Leonard v Scottish Prison Service

Mr Leonard (“the Claimant”) was employed by the Scottish Prison Service (“the Respondent”) as a prison officer at Polmont Young Offenders’ Institution. On 7 June 2010 an incident occurred where an inmate was assaulted by another prison officer. The inmate complained of this prison officer’s conduct and the fact that although the Claimant had been situated in the hallway outside of the room where the assault occurred the Claimant had taken no steps to prevent the assault or report it. The Respondent conducted an investigation and concluded that although the Claimant’s behaviour was not pre-meditated it was sufficiently negligent to constitute gross misconduct. After a disciplinary hearing held on 1 February 2011 the Claimant was dismissed by letter on 16 February 2011.

The Claimant subsequently filed a complaint of unfair dismissal at the Employment Tribunal. The Employment Tribunal was held and its judgment registered on 22 February 2012. It concluded that the Respondent’s dismissal was because of the Claimant’s negligence in failing to undertake a series of required actions and was within the range of reasonable responses in the circumstances. Further, the fact that the Claimant had only been informed shortly prior to his disciplinary hearing of a number of the charges against him was not necessarily fatal to a finding of fair dismissal. The Claimant appealed on the grounds that the Respondent had erred in its application of Strouthos v London Underground Ltd, precedent for the principle that an employee should be given reasonable opportunity to respond to the charges against him (and that the employer should particularly not add in charges – especially those more serious in nature).

The law relating to gross misconduct, negligence and unfair dismissal

An employee with qualifying service has the right not to be unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996. To fairly dismiss an employee an employer must do two things:

  1. Make a decision to dismiss that is within the range of reasonable responses in the circumstances; and
  2. Conduct a fair procedure in deciding to dismiss the employee

If the employee’s conduct is sufficiently serious to breach their contract of employment then the employer may dismiss the employee for “gross misconduct”. If gross misconduct applies then the employer may terminate the contract of employment without notice. So, what can constitute gross misconduct? An act or a series of acts (if sufficiently serious) can be sufficient to justify a gross misconduct dismissal. Further, the conduct does not necessarily have to be an action on the part of the employee – it can equally be a failure to take a particular action. For example, if a nurse is supposed to undertake hourly rounds of her ward but falls asleep (and something happens to a patient in that time) then she has been negligent because of her failure to undertake a particular act. If this failure is particularly serious it can justify a finding of dismissal. However, as above, it must be sufficiently serious to justify dismissal and must be carried out in the correct manner.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Leonard v Scottish Prison Service

The Employment Appeal Tribunal rejected the Claimant’s appeal on the basis that it was misconceived. The EAT concluded that Strouthos v London Underground Ltd would apply if the reason for the dismissal was that the Claimant’s act was premeditated (as the Respondent had introduced fresh allegations of premeditation at a late date in the investigation). The Employment Tribunal had found that the actual reason for dismissal was the Claimant’s negligence, not the Claimant had acted in a premeditated fashion. The appeal was therefore misconceived and rejected.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ thoughts on Leonard v Scottish Prison Service

This case shows that if Respondents conduct relatively thorough and fair investigations that it is difficult for Claimants to succeed in claims of unfair dismissal, even if there are elements of unfairness in the process.

Redmans are specialist employment solicitors based in Richmond, London.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.73 Average

92 Reviews

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 1 day ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 week ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 week ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 week ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 1 week ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 1 month ago