Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In this post we’ll take a look at the case of Golden Eye (International) Ltd & Anor v Telefonica UK Ltd , which was handed down from the High Court Chancery Division yesterday (26 March 2012). This case concerns the attempt by Golden Eye (International) Ltd & Anor (“the Claimant”) to force Telefonica UK Ltd (also known as “O2”) (“the Defendant”) to disclose the identity of 9,124 IP addresses through the granting of a “Norwich Pharmacal” order.

The facts in Golden Eye (International) Ltd & Anor v Telefonica UK Ltd

The Defendant provides a number of services in the UK but the service relevant to this case is its provision of internet services to customers as an Internet Service Provider (“ISP”). The Claimant believes that copyright in a number of its works has been infringed by customers of the Defendant, primarily by sharing the Claimant’s copyrighted work over Peer to Peer (“P2P”) networks. The Claimant is not alleging any tort being committed by the Defendant but is seeking disclosure of the identity of the identity of 9,124 of its clients that match the IP addresses provided by the Claimant. The Claimant is therefore seeking an Order from the High Court known as a “Norwich Pharmacal” Order. However, a key consideration for the Court in granting such an Order is the balancing of the various rights of both those seeking the Norwich Pharmacal Order and those provisionally subject to the Norwich Pharmacal Order.

The law relating to Norwich Pharmacal Orders

Norwich Pharmacal Orders may be granted if the following five conditions (espoused in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd) are satisfied:

  1. That an arguable wrong has been committed against the Claimant
  2. That the Defendant is mixed up in the arguable wrong
  3. That the Claimant is intending to seek redress for the wrong
  4. That the disclosure of the information which the Claimant required is necessary for it to pursue that redress; and
  5. That the Court is satisfied that it should exercise its discretion in favour of granting relief

The High Court’s decision in Golden Eye (International) Ltd & Anor v Telefonica UK Ltd

The High Court considered that the test in Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd had been met. An arguable wrong had been committed against the Claimant as its rights in its copyrighted work had potentially been infringed by clients of the Defendant. The Defendant was (and possibly still is) mixed up in the arguable wrong as its clients potentially had (and potentially still are) sharing the copyrighted works through the internet service provided by the Defendant. Golden Eye (International) Ltd & Anor are attempting to seek redress for the arguable wrong – this much was clear from its “speculative invoicing” draft letter and that it was attempting to address alleged infringements of its copyrighted work. The High Court further believed it absolutely necessary for the Claimant to pursue the claim that the information that the Defendant possesses be disclosed, and also that the granting of the Norwich Pharmacal Order was proportionate in the circumstances.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.67 Average

66 Reviews

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 4 weeks ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

They are busy people but manage well so generally I would recommend them.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient and professional service from my first phone call making an enquiry. Timescales of the matter in hand were met and within the agreed budget. Would highly recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

Lisa B

Really very good service, always available to answer questions, provide my with any information I needed to make informed decisions.

Posted 1 month ago