Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case concerns the temporal scope of the “reasonable range of responses” test – specifically as to whether the reasonableness of a dismissal should be considered at the date of the dismissal (the “Effective Date of Termination”) or whether it should cover the appeal process as well. The Employment Appeal Tribunal considered that a consideration of the reasonableness of the dismissal should extend past the Effective Date of Termination and evaluate the reasonableness of the dismissal until the ending of the appeal process. This therefore potentially affected liability for unfair dismissal in the present case.

The facts relating to First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Parhar

Mr Pahar (“the Claimant”) commenced employment with First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd (“the Respondent”) as a bus driver on 8 December 1979. On 3 November 2009 the Claimant went on sick leave. During his period of sick leave he was medically assessed by Dr Bond, who was employed in the Respondent’s Occupational Health department. Dr Bond carried out a number of assessments of the Claimant between December 2009 and June 2010. On 7 June 2010 Dr Bond submitted a report which stated that the Claimant wanted to return to work but was not yet well enough to do so. She recommended that he was not likely to be able to return to work driving buses for a period of 8 weeks. The Respondent, pursuant to Dr Bond’s report, proceeded to dismiss the Claimant on 10 June 2010. The Claimant appealed against this dismissal. At the appeal hearing the manager in charge stated that he was willing to withdraw the dismissal if the Claimant would undergo a driving assessment in 5 days’ time. The Claimant stated that he would have to check with his GP and the manager stated he was not prepared to wait any longer. The Claimant’s dismissal was therefore upheld. The Claimant subsequently made a claim for unfair dismissal in the Employment Tribunal. The Southampton Employment Tribunal concluded that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed and the Respondent appealed on the basis that the Employment Tribunal had misdirected itself with regards to the time period over which it should consider the fairness of the dismissal.

The law relating to unfair dismissal and reasonableness of dismissal

Employees have the right, under s.94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, not to be unfairly dismissed from their employment. A consideration of whether a dismissal is fair rests on an assessment of the two “branches” of unfair dismissal – procedural fairness and substantive fairness. Although the two branches are, to an extent, interwoven, we will in the present circumstance consider substantive fairness only.

In order to determine whether a decision to dismiss is substantively fair the “range of reasonable responses” test is used. This is a subjective test, not an objective test – whether a dismissal is fair depends on the mindset of the person dismissing and is based upon their understanding of the context of the decision to dismiss. The test is composed of three elements, involving an evaluation by the Employment Tribunal of: whether a reasonable and thorough investigation had been carried out; whether the person dismissing the employee had an honest belief in the necessity to dismiss the employee based upon this investigation; and whether the decision to dismiss was a reasonable one considering what the person dismissing the employee knew. The “range of reasonable responses” test is heavily weighted in favour of employers – should the proper procedure be carried out in dismissing the employee then generally only the most perverse decisions to dismiss will be deemed unfair.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Parhar

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the Respondent’s appeal against the finding of unfair dismissal and remitted the case to the same Tribunal for a further hearing relating to liability. The reason the Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the decision to dismiss was that it believed the original Employment Tribunal had considered the issue of the fairness of dismissal only up until the Effective Date of Termination and had not scrutinised the appeal process. It is well established that the Employment Tribunal should look at the whole of the disciplinary process, including post-dismissal internal appeals. This is significant as the original finding of unfair dismissal was based upon the Respondent’s unwillingness to wait 8 weeks to see whether the Claimant returned to work – a defect which the Respondent argued was “cured” by the appeal process.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ thoughts on First Hampshire & Dorset Ltd v Parhar

Claimants for unfair dismissal in the Employment Tribunal should generally bear in mind two elements related to the appeal against their dismissal. Firstly, the fairness of their dismissal will be impacted upon by both their and their employer’s conduct in the appeal process and, secondly, that the date for submitting a complaint to the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal runs from the Effective Date of Termination (the day their dismissal takes effect) and not from the date that the appeal process finishes.

Respondents should note similar points and take care that the manner in which the appeal process is handled is fair. If not, they are opening themselves up to claims for unfair dismissal (among other potential claims).

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog.

Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 1 month ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 1 month ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 1 month ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 2 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 2 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 2 months ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago