Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Mr David James v Coedffranc Community Council: 1600068/2018 the Employment Tribunal concluded that an applicant for employment had been directly discriminated against because of his age when the prospective employer refused to employ him because of his age.

Factual background in James v Coedffranc Community Council

The claimant, Mr David James, was 67 years of age at the date of interview for a post of park attendant with the respondent council, Coedffranc Community Council. The previous park attendant had just retired from his previous job at the age of 67.

The successful candidate “S” was 62 years of age at the date of the interview.

The application form used included a space for candidates to fill in their date of birth. The panel that undertook the shortlisting process was the same panel that subsequently undertook the interviews; Councillor Wingrave, Councillor Davies Ms Wendy Thomas (Clerk to the council). Ms Thomas had made a note of candidates’ ages at the shortlisting stage. The applicants that were not shortlisted were younger than the claimant.  Following the shortlisting, two candidates were much stronger overall, the claimant and S. An assessment form was used during the interview which was based on a rating key; for each question the candidate could receive up to 4 marks for their answer from each panel member.

The claimant’s evidence was that he thought his interview was going well right up until Councillor Wingrave said “I’ve just noticed how old you are”. He was then asked whether he intended to only stay in the job for a year or so. Counsellor Wingrave then enquired “How’s your health anyway”.

Following the interviews, the three panel members compared the information and each score individually. When totaling the scores, errors were made.  If the marks had been correctly added up, the claimant would have scored 128 and S 126.  As it was on the day, when the panel’s marks were combined, the claimant had 128 and S was on 130.

On Councillor Wingrave’s scoring sheet for the claimant, there was a handwritten ‘67’ by his name and on S’s sheet, ‘62’ that had been circled.

The law on age discrimination

The Tribunal considered section 13 Equality Act 2010, subsection 1, which provides:

“A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others.”

The protected characteristic relied upon by the claimant is age. In relation to age discrimination, section 5 EqA provides: “Age  (1) In relation to the protected characteristic of age —  (a) a reference to a person who has a particular protected characteristic is a reference to a person of a particular age group;  (b) a reference to persons who share a protected characteristic is a reference to persons of the same age group (2) A reference to an age group is a reference to a group of persons defined by reference to age, whether by reference to a particular age or to a range of ages.”

The Tribunal considered whether the treatment of the claimant was “because of” the protected characteristic. The Equality Human Rights Commission Code of Practice states that: “Whilst a protected characteristic needs to be a cause of the less favourable treatment, it does not need to be the only or even the main cause.”

Conclusion and decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held that the decision made by the respondent not to provide the position of parking attendant to the claimant was direct age discrimination. The Employment Tribunal reached an inference that the Council’s conduct was discriminatory based on the following conduct:

  • Councillor Wingrave’s comments regarding age;
  • The note taking of the ages of the claimant and S by Councillor Wingrave;
  • The circling of the age of the successful candidate S by Councillor Wingrave; and
  • The fact that Councillor Wingrave’s decision was a ‘game changer’ with regards to whether the claimant would be awarded the position (the other two councillors had scored the claimant the best marks)

Our lawyers’ comments on James v Coedffranc Community Council

Melissa Chin, a Legal Executive in the employment team at Redmans, commented on the case: “Employers should ensure that they treat all applicants for employment fairly and equally, irrespective of any protected characteristic that an applicant may make – if an employer fails to do so, as in this case, they may find themselves the subject of potentially costly and embarrassing Employment Tribunal proceedings.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in James v Coedffranc Community Council can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

103 Reviews

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 2 days ago

Mike H

Very professional, friendly, proactive. I would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

Fantastic and quick service!

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

I was very satisfied with Redmans' service. Clear, sensible advice and the bill was in line with their estimate. I would recommend them.

Posted 2 days ago

Eugene A

Excellent communication and guidance provided on the redundancy settlement process. Process was concluded quickly, very satisfied with service.

Posted 2 days ago

Harold d

Great personlised service and quick communication. Solicitor helps greatly in understanding the options and advising best course of action.

Posted 2 days ago

Trish B

Professional and efficient. A pleasure to deal with.

Posted 3 days ago

Omi H

Excellent communication. A tactical negotiator to get the best package for the client. Highly recommended.

Posted 3 days ago

Nicholas S

Very prompt and efficient. Excellent advice.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Very helpful and always available to help! It was my first time to deal with any solicitors, but I felt very supported until the end!! Well done!! and great Job!!

Posted 1 week ago

Mohamed F

Excellent and professional solicitors, highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 1 month ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 month ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 month ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 month ago