Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs L Richardson v Neovia Logistics Services (UK) Ltd and Flex Recruitment Plus Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), the Employment Tribunal held that a female employee had been sexually harassed by a colleague who continually gave her ‘bear hugs’, and that she had been victimised after being ostracised by colleagues at work for complaining about the harassment.

The facts in Richardson v Neovia Logistics Services (UK) Ltd and Flex Recruitment Plus Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)

Mrs Richardson worked for Flex Recruitment Plus Ltd (“Flex”). Flex is an agency that provides agency workers in the transport business.

In 2012 Mrs Richardson’s marriage of 30 years ended in divorce. In February 2015, shortly after she started working for Neovia, she began a relationship with one of the delivery drivers. At about that time Mr Jowett, a Warehouse Operative whose work involved dealing with Mrs Richardson, began to make crude remarks about her partner and her sex life.

In June 2015 Mrs Richardson was involved in a car accident; the result of this was that she found herself having to undertake desk duties, which brought her into more regular contact with Mr Jowett. Mrs Richardson’s relationship with her boyfriend ended in July 2015 but Mr Jowett’s behaviour, including crude sexual remarks, continued; they also became more pointed as time went on. When Mrs Richardson complained or attempted to complain then Mr Jowett became critical of her work, and he would become agitated and shout at her; he would then apologise to her, but when he apologised he would often put his arms round her shoulder or give her a hug. Mrs Richardson began to suspect that he was using his conduct as a pretext to hug her, despite her telling him not to touch or hug her.

Over the months from July 2015 Mrs Richardson found that Mr Jowett’s behaviour in trying to give her a hug or physically touch her increased – for example, he would lean over her to retrieve his telephone, which invaded her personal space. She chose not to make a formal complaint, hoping that he would simply stop the behaviour.

On 6 November 2015 Mr Jowett gave Mrs Richardson a bear hug, and did so again on 13 November 2018 – on the second occasion Mr Jowett slid his hand across Mrs Richardson’s chest and touched her breasts and elbow. Mrs Richardson then told Mr Jowett “you do know this is classed as sexual harassment”.

Mrs Richardson subsequently complained about Mr Jowett’s behaviour, complaining that Mr Jowett repeatedly hugged her and sometimes ‘squeezed her bum”. No action was taken against Mr Jowett, whether formally or informally, but he was informed that a complaint had been made against him by Mrs Richardson. Mr Jowett was surprised and upset about this, and in turn submitted a complaint about Mrs Richarsson.

After Mr Jowett was informed of Mrs Richardson’s complaint he proceeded to ostracize her in the workplace, making jokes about sexually harassing her and continuing to sexually harass her.

On 4 December 2015 Mrs Richardson went to see her GP and was diagnosed with work-related stress; she was prescribed Fluoxetine, an anti-depressant.

On 19 November 2015 Mrs Richardson was due to have an appraisal with Matt Angell. She received a negative appraisal in this meeting, and was surprised and disappointed by this.. Later the same day Mr Jowett angrily approached Mrs Richardson and admonished her for not doing gate passes. It was pointed out to Mr Jowett that gate passes was not Mrs Richardson’s responsibility, but she did this voluntarily sometimes. Mrs Richardson noticed that attitudes toward her in the workplace had changed, and that the male managers appeared to have turned against her.

On 20 November 2015 Mrs Richardson suffered a panic attack and took time off work. She suffered a recurrence of the panic attack on 30 November 2015 and was then told that Mr Jowett was to be moved away from her.  Mrs Richardson subsequently reported the sexual harassment to the police.

On 9 December 2015 Mrs Richardson was told that the company had investigated both her complaint against Mr Jowett and his against her. The decision was that Mr Jowett would receive counselling but that otherwise the matter was closed. Mrs Richardson was upset and complained that no action had been taken about the bullying and sexual harassment. She was advised that if she wanted to take the matter any further she should make a formal complaint. Mrs Richardson was subsequently told that if she made a formal complaint Mr Jowett would be suspended from work; however when she made the complaint she found that not only was Mr Jowett in work but that he was working in close proximity to her.

On 18 December 2017 Mrs Richardson was signed off work and did not return to work thereafter.

Mrs Richardson subsequently brought claims for sexual harassment and victimisation in the Employment Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Employment Tribunal found in Mrs Richardson’s favour in both her claims for sexual harassment and victimisation.

Sexual harassment

The Employment Tribunal found in Mrs Richardson’s favour in her claim for sexual harassment.

Victimisation

The Employment Tribunal also found that Mrs Richardson had been subjected to victimisation – she had submitted various protected acts (including the allegation of sexual harassment on 13 November 2015) and that she had been subjected to the following detriments, including but not limited to: being ostracised by her colleagues; being threatened with suspension; being blamed for ongoing issues at work

Our solicitors’ views on the case of in Richardson v Neovia Logistics Services (UK) Ltd and Flex Recruitment Plus Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation)

Chris Hadrill, the partner in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “If an allegation of sexual harassment is made in the workplace then employers should be careful to ensure that a prompt, thorough and fair investigation is carried out into the allegations – a failure to do so may amount to further discrimination or victimisation”.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Richardson v Neovia Logistics Services (UK) Ltd and Flex Recruitment Plus Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.70 Average

73 Reviews

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 6 days ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 1 month ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 1 month ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 1 month ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 1 month ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 2 months ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 2 months ago