Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others: 2423941/2017, the Employment Tribunal held that a member of bar staff was dismissed because of her pregnancy, rather than because she was redundant or because she had engaged in misconduct.

The facts in Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others

Ms Barnes started working at Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd t/a The Wiend Bar (“the Bar”) in November 2015 as assistant manager. Mr Clayton and Mr Douglas were two of the four directors of the Bar and the majority shareholders, each having a 45% shareholding; Mr Douglas also assumed personal responsibility for the lease of the Bar premises and funded the refurbishment costs.

The Bar was originally projected to turn over up to £11,000 per week, but was only achieving approx £6,000 per week instead. As time went on Mr Douglas and Mr Clayton decided to cut costs, cancelling the Sky subscription and ordering staff to keep a close eye on costs.

In May 2016 an employee was dismissed as ‘redundant’ because a customer made a complaint about her.

By March 2017 Mr Clayton and Mr Douglas were considering making Ms Barnes redundant in order to improve profitability; however, Mr Clayton persuaded Mr Douglas that they should not make Ms Barnes redundant – this was in part because Mr Clayton was due to get married shortly, and he wished for Ms Barnes to cover his shifts at the Bar whilst he was on honeymoon.

In May 2017 the Bar employed two new staff on a part-time basis.

On 20 June 2017 Ms Barnes sent Mr Clayton a message with a picture of a positive pregnancy test. She also sent a message jokingly asking what she should do next given the fact that she was pregnant. Mr Clayton replied “laughing” and he then messaged her “gonna push you downstairs”.

On 25 June 2017 Mr Clayton informed Mr Douglas of Ms Barnes’ pregnancy.

On 29 June 2017 Mr Douglas was asked by a third party whether the Bar would be closing soon, as they had attended the Bar recently and there had not been much stock on show. On 30 June 2018 Mr Douglas attended the Bar and found that there was very little stock on the premises. He spoke to Mr Clayton who blamed Ms Barnes for the lack of stock, as she had allegedly overslept and missed a delivery.

On 6 July 2017 Mr Douglas had a telephone conversation with Ms Barnes – in this conversation he informed her that he believed that she was to blame for the lock of stock at the Bar; he also informed her that the Bar was in financial difficulties and that they could not afford to pay her any more.

On 10 July 2017 Mr Douglas sent Ms Barnes a letter confirming that she was being dismissed for various reasons, including that the business was in financial difficulties and that he felt that she was responsible for the lack of stock.

On 26 October 2017 the Bar went into creditors’ voluntary liquidation.

Ms Barnes subsequently made claims in the Employment Tribunal, alleging:

  • That Mr Clayton’s texts on 20 June 2017 constituted unfavourable treatment because she was pregnant;
  • That Mr Douglas’ conduct on 6 July 2017 constituted unfavourable treatment because she was pregnant; and
  • That she had been dismissed because she was pregnant

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Employment Tribunal held that the conduct of Mr Clayton and Mr Douglas on, respectively, 20 June 2017 and 6 July 2017 did not constitute pregnancy discrimination – Mr Clayton’s conduct on 20 June 2017 was, the Tribunal found, part of a joke with Ms Barnes and was not serious, and it found that Mr Douglas’ conduct on 6 July 2017 constituted part of his act to dismiss her and therefore not a separate act to that of the dismissal.

The Employment Tribunal did find, however, that the reason for Ms Barnes’ dismissal was because of her pregnancy, and therefore found her dismissal to be an act of discrimination and automatically unfair. The Tribunal found that Ms Barnes would not have been dismissed at the beginning of July 2017 and that there was a significant causal connection between the timing of her announcement of her pregnancy and her dismissal; there was not a redundancy situation that existed at any time and Mr Douglas also, the Tribunal found, acted ‘in haste’ once he was told that Ms Barnes was pregnant.

The Employment Tribunal ordered a remedy hearing be held on a separate date.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others

Chris Hadrill, the partner in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “Once employers are aware that an employee is pregnant they should take great care to ensure that any action taken against the pregnant employee is reasoned, justified, and fair, otherwise they may face a claim of pregnancy discrimination as in this case – act in haste, repent at leisure.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others: 2423941/2017 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.70 Average

76 Reviews

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 week ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 2 weeks ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 3 weeks ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 1 month ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 months ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 months ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 months ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 2 months ago