Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr C Constandinou and Mr T Kakkoufa v Supadance International Ltd and Others: 3200222/2016 and 3200230/2016, the Employment Tribunal held that the dismissals of the Claimants were both unfair and discriminatory (due to their age), awarding them cumulatively a sum of almost £80,000 in compensation.

The facts in Mr C Constandinou and Mr T Kakkoufa v Supadance International Ltd and Others

Mr Constandinou and Mr Kakkoufa (“the Claimants”) were employed by Supadance International Ltd (Supadance), a business that specialises in the production and sale of specialist ballroom dancing shoes, and were long-standing employees (having, respectively 25 years’ and 41 years’ service respectively). Mr and Mrs Free were, respectively, Chairman and Managing Director of Supadance.

In 2014 Supadance experienced a drop in sales and in April 2015 Mr and Mrs Free decided to make redundancies in order to address the profitability of the business. In April 2015 there was a meeting at Mr Constandinou’s house which Mr Antoniou (General Manager) and the Claimants attended. This meeting was recorded covertly by the Claimants. In the meeting Mr Antoniou stated that it was probable that the Claimants would be made redundant as they were high earners and that they were being talked about by Mr and Mrs Free as being first on the list for redundancies. The following comments were also made by Mr Antoniou in the meeting:

  • “the other thing as well when we put these five people forward we think they are not going to turn around and say why aren’t you sacking the older ones”
  • “if they are looking at the future another five or ten years in front really is the older ones that goes”

On 25 May 2015 Mr Neo Constandinou, Mr Constandinou’s son, was in the car with Mr Antoniou and there was a discussion between the two. Neo Constandinou stated that Mr Antoniou compared the factory’s workforce to a football team and said old workers like old football players need to leave so that it could bring in new blood otherwise the team would not be efficient.

On 18 August 2015 the Claimants were called to a further meeting in which they were informed that they were being made redundant. Again, this meeting was recorded. There was no prior notification provided to the Claimants that they were at risk of redundancy, and the transcript of the meeting made it clear that Mr and Mrs Free had been actively involved in the decision to make them redundant. In that meeting the Claimants asked what they were supposed to live on now and were, in return, asked by Mrs Free whether they could draw a pension yet. The Claimants worked their 12-week notice period to November 2015.

The Claimants subsequently brought claims in the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal, direct age discrimination, and holiday pay.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Employment Tribunal upheld the Claimants’ claims for unfair dismissal and direct age discrimination.

Unfair dismissal

The Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant’s dismissal was for the reason of redundancy,  but that their dismissal was unfair – there had been no procedure followed, no consultation, and no consideration of alternatives.

Direct age discrimination

The Employment Tribunal drew inferences that the Claimants’ dismissals may have been discriminatory from the following facts: Mr Antinou’s comments in April 2015 and May 2015, Mr Free’s pensions remark in August 2015, and Mrs Free’s evidence suggesting that she regarded previous redundancies as retirements. The Employment Tribunal further held that at least part of the reason for the way in which the Claimants had been treated was their age, and that there was no suitable alternative explanation to the way they had been treated.

Remedy

The Employment Tribunal awarded the Claimants a total 0f £74,023.51, divided as follows:

  • Mr Constandinou: £33,647.68 (comprised of £20,583.84 in respect of injury to feelings and £13,063.84 in respect of financial loss)
  • Mr Kakkoufa: £40,375.83 (comprised of £20,583.84 in respect of injury to feelings and £17,446.40 in respect of financial loss)

Our solicitors’ views on the case of in Mr C Constandinou and Mr T Kakkoufa v Supadance International Ltd and Others

Chris Hadrill, the partner in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “Employers should ensure that they undertake fair, reasonable, and reasoned redundancy processes – a failure to do so can be costly, as in this case.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr C Constandinou and Mr T Kakkoufa v Supadance International Ltd and Others can be found here (liability) and here (remedy).

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

103 Reviews

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 2 days ago

Mike H

Very professional, friendly, proactive. I would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

Fantastic and quick service!

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

I was very satisfied with Redmans' service. Clear, sensible advice and the bill was in line with their estimate. I would recommend them.

Posted 2 days ago

Eugene A

Excellent communication and guidance provided on the redundancy settlement process. Process was concluded quickly, very satisfied with service.

Posted 2 days ago

Harold d

Great personlised service and quick communication. Solicitor helps greatly in understanding the options and advising best course of action.

Posted 2 days ago

Trish B

Professional and efficient. A pleasure to deal with.

Posted 3 days ago

Omi H

Excellent communication. A tactical negotiator to get the best package for the client. Highly recommended.

Posted 3 days ago

Nicholas S

Very prompt and efficient. Excellent advice.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Very helpful and always available to help! It was my first time to deal with any solicitors, but I felt very supported until the end!! Well done!! and great Job!!

Posted 1 week ago

Mohamed F

Excellent and professional solicitors, highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 1 month ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 month ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 month ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 month ago