Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In this post we’re going to look at the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case of Plymouth City Council v White UKEAT/0333/13/LA, which covered applications for specific disclosure and when disclosure can be ordered by an Employment Judge.

Synopsis: the Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the Employment Judge had erred in applying a “relevance” test instead of whether a “necessary” test i.e. whether the documents where necessary for a fair trial.

The facts in Plymouth City Council v White UKEAT/0333/13/LA

The claimant, who was dismissed after the respondent discovered facts which suggested he had a “propensity for violence”, brought an unfair dismissal claim in the employment tribunal in 2012 (as well as a discrimination claim which was subsequently struck out). There was a five-hour case management discussion in May 2013 relating to the disclosure of documents for the employment tribunal and the Employment Judge ordered that a number of documents must be disclosed by the respondent because they were “relevant” to the claim brought by the claimant. The respondent subsequently appealed this ruling, claiming that the Employment Judge had applied the wrong test.

The law relating to applications for specific disclosure

The law relating to applications for specific disclosure in the Employment Tribunal is fairly clear. Under the (old rules) the Employment Tribunal may order disclosure against any person in Great Britain, as long as the documents are both relevant and necessary for fairly disposing of the proceedings.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Plymouth City Council v White UKEAT/0333/13/LA

The Employment Appeal Tribunal, chaired by HHJ McMullen, determined that the Employment Judge had applied the wrong test in ordering disclosure of documents, as he had applied the “relevance” test without considering whether the documents were necessary for a fair trial. The correct test, as helpfully laid out by HHJ McMullen in the judgment, is as follows:

  1. The Judge must first consider whether the document sought is relevant
  2. If it is relevant, the next question is whether it is necessary for the fair trial of the case for it to be ordered to be disclosed. Where there is an objection based upon confidentiality of the document in question, the Judge should examine the document itself to determine whether or not it should still be disclosed
  3. If the document is relevant and necessary and is to be disclosed, the Judge should consider whether there is a more nuanced way of disclosing the material so as to respect confidentiality and may decided to order disclosure of the document partially or wholly, normally through redaction of the document
  4. The Employment Judge, upon having read the documents and ordered disclosure, should not conduct the full hearing unless the parties agree to this.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

124 Reviews

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 2 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 4 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 4 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 4 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 4 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 4 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris was absolutely excellent. Clear and concise, offering sound advice.

Posted 4 months ago

Tim O

Experienced and competent advisors

Posted 4 months ago

Rachel A

Quick and expert assistance. I would highly recommend Chris for any of your legal needs.

Posted 4 months ago

Joe S

I was very happy with the service provided by Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. I felt very comfortable discussing all matters with Chris and am very grateful for all the help and guidance I was given throughout the whole process. I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to friends and family!

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

I had a very good experience working with Chris Hadrill during a difficult and emotional time. This held true from the moment I spoke to him on the phone, to the end of the process. Overall, he was attentive, professional and highly supportive. He provided sound advice and clarity. It was the reviews that led me to Redmans! I was very happy to know they were all true. I highly recommend working with Redmans Solicitors. Thank-you to the entire team!

Posted 5 months ago

Anonymous

Good service

Posted 5 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service. Highly recommend.

Posted 5 months ago

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 5 months ago