Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In this post we’re going to look at the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case of Plymouth City Council v White UKEAT/0333/13/LA, which covered applications for specific disclosure and when disclosure can be ordered by an Employment Judge.

Synopsis: the Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the Employment Judge had erred in applying a “relevance” test instead of whether a “necessary” test i.e. whether the documents where necessary for a fair trial.

The facts in Plymouth City Council v White UKEAT/0333/13/LA

The claimant, who was dismissed after the respondent discovered facts which suggested he had a “propensity for violence”, brought an unfair dismissal claim in the employment tribunal in 2012 (as well as a discrimination claim which was subsequently struck out). There was a five-hour case management discussion in May 2013 relating to the disclosure of documents for the employment tribunal and the Employment Judge ordered that a number of documents must be disclosed by the respondent because they were “relevant” to the claim brought by the claimant. The respondent subsequently appealed this ruling, claiming that the Employment Judge had applied the wrong test.

The law relating to applications for specific disclosure

The law relating to applications for specific disclosure in the Employment Tribunal is fairly clear. Under the (old rules) the Employment Tribunal may order disclosure against any person in Great Britain, as long as the documents are both relevant and necessary for fairly disposing of the proceedings.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Plymouth City Council v White UKEAT/0333/13/LA

The Employment Appeal Tribunal, chaired by HHJ McMullen, determined that the Employment Judge had applied the wrong test in ordering disclosure of documents, as he had applied the “relevance” test without considering whether the documents were necessary for a fair trial. The correct test, as helpfully laid out by HHJ McMullen in the judgment, is as follows:

  1. The Judge must first consider whether the document sought is relevant
  2. If it is relevant, the next question is whether it is necessary for the fair trial of the case for it to be ordered to be disclosed. Where there is an objection based upon confidentiality of the document in question, the Judge should examine the document itself to determine whether or not it should still be disclosed
  3. If the document is relevant and necessary and is to be disclosed, the Judge should consider whether there is a more nuanced way of disclosing the material so as to respect confidentiality and may decided to order disclosure of the document partially or wholly, normally through redaction of the document
  4. The Employment Judge, upon having read the documents and ordered disclosure, should not conduct the full hearing unless the parties agree to this.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog.

Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 1 month ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 1 month ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 1 month ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago