Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr M Sanha v Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd 3200292/2018, the Claimant was employed as a full-time cleaner by the Respondent. Once his residence permit expired, he re-applied for an extension. He was dismissed when this did not come through. His employer wrongly presumed that he was subject to immigration control and that it would suffer a penalty if it continued to employ him. The Claimant was successful in winning all his claims for compensation although these were subject to a deduction due to his failure to mitigate his losses.

The facts in Mr M Sanha v Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd

The Clamant was employed by the Respondent from 3 August 2015. At the start of his employment, he produced his passport containing his residency permit which was valid from 16 August 2012 to 16 August 2017. The permit showed (and the Respondent therefore was on notice of that fact) that the Claimant was a family member of an EEA national and that he was permitted to work. As a family member of an EEA national, the Claimant was not subject to immigration control (s25 Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2006) as he did not need leave to remain in the UK. This meant that an employer of the Claimant could not be subject to a penalty provided that he remained resident with his (in this case), Portuguese wife.

On 24 July 2017, the Claimant made a written application to the Home Office to renew his residency permit and gave proof of posting of it to the Respondent (though not a copy of the actual application).

Due to a failure of the application to be processed in time, the Claimant was suspended without pay by the Respondent from 18 August 2017.  On 5 September 2017, the Respondent checked the Employer Checking Service (ECS) which confirmed that no certificate of application had been issued to the Claimant. The Respondent wrote to the Claimant on 13 September 2017, setting up a meeting and warning him that his employment was at risk unless he could find satisfactory proof of his right to work in the UK. At the meeting on 25 September 2017, the Claimant was not forthcoming about what had emerged since he applied in July. He showed again the Respondent proof of posting of a letter to the Home Office dated 22 September 2017 but did not explain that he had had to send in further documents to process his application. The Respondent did another ECS check on 29 September 2017 but still no certificate had been issued. The Respondent sent a letter of dismissal to the Claimant.

The Claimant was given a right of appeal but this was never received by the Respondent, who then gave his job to another person. On 26 October 2017, when the Claimant finally met with the Respondent and his residency permit had been approved, his job no longer existed. He was however offered 10 other vacancies for which he could apply. The Claimant refused to do so.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The ET found that the Respondent did not act reasonably either in not making a further enquiry of the Home Office before dismissing the Claimant or asking the Claimant further questions about what he understood the delay to be caused by. The Respondent relied solely on the two ECS checks and did not consider the Claimant’s status as an EEA family member or consider that the problem lay with a delay at the Home Office.

The ET considered the Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 98(2)(d) in which contravention of an enactment is a fair reason for dismissal. The ET pointed out that to rely on this as a fair reason, the employment must in fact have been in breach of an enactment. As the Claimant was not subject to s.25 of the Immigration Asylum and Nationality Act 2002, there could be no penalty imposed on the Respondent despite the expiry of the residency permit in the Claimant’s passport.

The Claimant was awarded lost wages over the period of suspension as well as compensation (basic and compensatory award) for the period up until 26 October 2017 and lost holiday pay. However, his failure not to mitigate his losses following the job opportunities provided by the Respondent on 26 October meeting, meant that his compensatory award was reduced by 25%.

Our solicitors’ view on Mr M Sanha v Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd

Caroline Lewis, specialist employment lawyer at Redmans Solicitors, commented on the case: “While there are potential criminal and civil implications for employers employing migrants who have no right to work in the UK, in this case, the employer knew of the employee’s circumstances including that he was married to an EEA citizen and therefore not subject to immigration control. This meant that the employer could not justify his reason to dismiss being because it was concerned it would be breaching immigration law. An employer must clearly know and understand the immigration status of all of its workers”.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.70 Average

76 Reviews

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 week ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 1 month ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 1 month ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 2 months ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 months ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 months ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 months ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 2 months ago