Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth [2018] EWCA Civ 1436 the Court of Appeal held that, in dismissing Ms Kilraine’s appeal, what Employment Tribunals must focus on in determining whether there had been a ‘protected disclosure’ was whether there was information disclosed which showed, or tended to show, information that, for example, constituted a breach of a legal obligation.

The factual background of Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth

Ms Kilraine commenced employment with London Borough of Wandsworth’s (“LBW”) education authority on 1 September 2003. Over the years, she made a number of complaints about her colleagues – on 21 July 2005, 25 January 2008, 10 December 2009, and 21 June 2010. Shortly after the 2010 complaint she was placed on garden leave and on 1 September 2010 she was suspended on full pay pending a disciplinary investigation into allegations that she had made unfounded allegations against colleagues.

In early 2011 LWB was forced to make cuts due to a reduction in government funding. Due to this Ms Kilraine’s employment was terminated on the grounds of redundancy on 30 September 2011.

Ms Kilraine subsequently brought claims for unfair dismissal and automatic unfair dismissal in the Employment Tribunal.

The Employment Tribunal decision

The Employment Tribunal upheld Ms Kilraine’s claim for unfair dismissal (but reduced compensation to nil because of the chance that she would have been fairly dismissed had a fair procedure been followed), but dismissed her claim for automatic unfair dismissal – the Tribunal held that, in particular, the complaints of 2009 and 2010 were not ‘protected disclosure’ and that the real reason for the termination was redundancy. The Tribunal, following Cavendish Munro Professional Risks Management Ltd v Geduld 2010 ICR 325, held that her complaints of 2009 and 2010 did not contain sufficient information and simply voiced concerns or allegations.

Ms Kilraine appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal decision

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the Tribunal’s decision – neither of the 2009 or 2010 complaints contained a disclosure of information that tended to show a failure to comply with a legal obligation or any other failures set out in section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996. The EAT also pointed out that the statute referenced the disclosure of “information” which “tends to show” particular information specified under the statute.

The EAT also warned, following Cavendish Munro, of the risk of ‘glossing’ section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996 to introduce a rigid dichotomy between ‘information’ and ‘allegations’ – all the EAT had been trying to state in Cavendish Munro was that a statement which took the form ‘you are not complying with health and safety requirements’ would be so general, unspecific, and lacking sufficient factual content to amount to a protected disclosure.

Ms Kilraine again appealed.

The decision of the Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal upheld the EAT’s decision, holding that the Tribunal had reached the correct conclusion that the relevant complaints did not disclose information which tended to show a breach of a legal obligation or any other failures as set out in section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996.

Our solicitors’ comments on Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case is important as it hopefully sets to rest a confusion in how section 43B Employment Rights Act 1996 which has existed since the judgment of the EAT in Cavendish Munro – what the Court of Appeal has emphasized is the necessity, in respect of each allegation, to consider whether there is sufficient and specific information disclosed which shows, or tends to show, information which would qualify as a protected disclosure.”

The transcript of the EAT’s decision in Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.70 Average

73 Reviews

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 6 days ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 1 month ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 1 month ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 1 month ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 1 month ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 2 months ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 2 months ago