Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Within the Copyright Patent and Design Act 1988 (“CPDA 1988”) owners of copyright possess the right not to have their copyright rights contravened. The two forms of infringement within the CPDA 1988:

  1. Primary infringement
  2. Secondary infringement

This post will examine in brief both kind of infringement and future posts will examine both in more detail.

Under s.16 CPDA 88 the owner of the copyright has the exclusive rights to undertake action constrained by copyright (“the restricted rights”). These include the rights to:

  • Copy the work
  • Issue copies of the work
  • Rent or lend the work to the public
  • Perform, show or play the work in public
  • Communicate the work to the public
  • Make an adaptation of the work

As above, these rights are commonly referred to as the “restricted rights”.

Primary infringement

Acts of primary infringement will not require knowledge or intention to infringe on the part of the ‘infringer’ – the violation of the restricted rights are strict liability “offences”.

An act of primary infringement is undertaken if an individual engages in any of the following acts which contravene the restricted rights of the owner of the copyrighted work:

  • Duplicating the work
  • Issue duplicates of the work
  • Rent or loan the work to the public
  • Perform, display or play the work in public
  • Communicate the work to the public
  • Make an adaptation of the work

Infringement occurs when either the whole or a substantial part of the author of the work’s restricted rights are used by another person without authorisation. This use can be direct or indirect on the part of the infringer. A direct infringement would be, for example, duplicating the architectural drawings of the owner. An indirect infringement could take place in the event the infringer went to the house that had been built utilizing the architectural drawings of the owner of the copyright and subsequently made a copy of the floor plan and dimensions of the house.

It can also be a breach of copyright to authorize any other individual to do any of the above acts which impinge upon the restricted rights of the owner of the copyrighted work.

Secondary infringement

Secondary infringement must involve some knowledge by the infringer of the copyrighted work. It is usually it is retailers or publishers who are ‘secondary infringers’. Examples of secondary infringement include:

  • Importing infringing copy
  • Possession of or dealings with infringing copy
  • Providing the opportunity for making infringing copies

Knowledge may be established on both an objective and a subjective basis. Objectively, a Defendant is held to have knowledge of infringement if a reasonable man would arrive at the relevant belief of infringement on the particular facts.

Practical tips relating to infringement of copyright

Infringement of copyright can be hard to prove – Defendants seldom leave traces of how they have violated copyright. However, the law concerning copyright does help the owners of copyright in particular ways – for example, there exists a presumption that the Defendant has copied the work of the Claimant if the two works are similar and the Defendant had access to that work. The burden is then placed on the Defendant to provide evidence that his work is original and not copied.

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.63 Average

30 Reviews

Anonymous

Immediate response to my initial enquiry. Very clear throughout the whole process and thorough and great communication which worked really well during quite a stressful time. Chris Hadrill was extremely helpful and made me feel at ease.

Posted 2 months ago

Nick D

I received a very professional service from Chris. The advice given really helped to leave me comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. Would be happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service from initial contact to deliverables.

Posted 3 months ago

Virginia K

Yes, Chris Hadrill answered all my questions and I feel more confident with my current situation

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill was referred to me my a friend of mine. I found the service to be efficient, quick and like Chris's direct approach to my work. Well done and thank you Chris!

Posted 3 months ago

Andy W

Very prompt & structured service that helped put my mind at rest at a difficult time

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

I have found Redmans to be very helpful, diligant and thoroughly professional when dealing with them, plus they gone that extra mile for me !

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Thank you to Chris Hadrill at Redmans for his assistance in settling my case. I contacted him at the very last minute and he was happy to help me and managed to get everything done on time and in a very professional manner. I will definitely be happy to work with him again .

Posted 4 months ago

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 7 months ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 7 months ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 8 months ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 8 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 8 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 8 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 8 months ago