Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case concerns the employment status of an equity partner, specifically relating to whether she could be considered a “worker” for the her whistleblowing claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

The facts in Clyde & Co Llp v Winkelhof

Mrs Winklehof commenced employment with Shadbolts (a law firm) as a solicitor in 2005 and was seconded to Tazmania, where she worked (among others) for a Tanzanian law firm, Ako Law. The managing partner of Ako law was at all times Mr Ongwamuhana (“Kibuta”). She transferred her employment to Clyde & Co (“the First Respondent”), another well-known law firm, on 21 February 2010, whereupon she became an equity member of the firm.

Mrs Winklehof became aware in November 2010 of potentially illegal activities engaged in by Kibuta and reported this to the Respondent’s Money Laundering Officers on 23 and 24 November 2010. She was dismissed by Ako Law on 25 November 2010 and suspended by the First Respondent on the same day. She was ‘dismissed’ by the Respondent on 6 January 2011 and subsequently brought claims at the Employment Tribunal for, among other things, sex discrimination and detriment because of her protected disclosure.

The law relating to the employment status of equity members (and partners generally)

Under s.230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 a worker is an individual who works (or used to work) under either a contract of employment or any other contract (express or implied, oral or written) where the individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services for another party to the contract whose status is not by virtue of the contract that of a client or customer of any profession or business undertaking carried on by the individual.

It has been established that partners can be “limb (a)” workers (or ‘employees’) for the purposes of protection against unfair dismissal (for example, the cases of Kovats v TFO Management LLP and Tiffin v Lester Aldridge LLP) but the situation presented here was, on the facts, a novel one – the question of whether a partner or equity member could be a “limb (b) worker” for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 had not been addressed before.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment in Clyde & Co Llp v Winkelhof

An Employment Judge had initially struck out Mrs Winkelhof’s claim at a Pre-Hearing Review on the basis that she was not a “limb (b)” “worker” and therefore could not claim for detriment due to the protected disclosure she had made. The Employment Judge accepted that she was operating under a contract of employment, that she was personally providing services related to that contract, and that the services provided were to another party to the contract. However, the Employment Judge considered that Clyde & Co LLP was a client of the Claimant’s and she was therefore excluded from claiming.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal rejected this analysis. It considered that the First Respondent was not a client or customer of the Claimant as she was in a “subordinate position” (see Byrne Brothers v Baird. The Employment Appeal Tribunal therefore concluded that an equity member or partner can, dependent on the facts of the matter, be a “limb (b)” “worker” for the purpose of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore qualify for protection from detriment because of a protected disclosure (or “whistleblowing”).

Our specialist employment solicitors’ view on Clyde & Co Llp v Winkelhof

This is an interesting and, as the Employment Appeal Tribunal noted, novel case. The conclusion of the Employment Appeal Tribunal appears to be a just and correct one in the circumstances – the First Respondent on the facts did not appear to have been a client of the Claimant’s. This conclusion was supported by the fact that the Claimant had been specifically recruited by the First Respondent and that she was in a subordinate position (i.e. unable to exercise unfettered discretion) in her workplace.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.67 Average

66 Reviews

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 4 weeks ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

They are busy people but manage well so generally I would recommend them.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient and professional service from my first phone call making an enquiry. Timescales of the matter in hand were met and within the agreed budget. Would highly recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

Lisa B

Really very good service, always available to answer questions, provide my with any information I needed to make informed decisions.

Posted 1 month ago