chris-hadrill-profileIn this post, employment law solicitor Chris Hadrill examines the circumstances in which it is possible to set aside a settlement agreement.

Under the law of contract, there are certain defined circumstances whereby a settlement agreement may be invalid and can be set aside. These include (but are not limited to):

  1. Where a party to the settlement agreement lack capacity (for example, the party has a mental disability which rendered them incapable of understanding or consenting to the agreement)
  2. Where there is no valid or complete agreement;
  3. Where there has been duress or undue influence;
  4. Where the settlement agreement is illegal as a result of statute or the general law;
  5. Where a mistake has been made about a fundamental matter or which makes it impossible to perform the settlement agreement; and/or
  6. Where there has been a misrepresentation of a material fact in certain circumstances

We will look briefly at each of the above points briefly in this article today – we’ll then look at each point in-depth in further articles in the future (note: I explored the effect of a fraudulent misrepresentation in this post).

Where a party to the settlement agreement lack capacity

A contracting capacity must have capacity to enter into a settlement agreement (or, indeed, any form of contract). Although the law presumes that every person has capacity to contract there are three categories of individuals who may lack person contractual capacity:

  1. Minors
  2. People lacking the requisite mental capacity
  3. People who are drunk at the time of entering into the contract

With regards to corporate entities, company¬†directors have the power (free of any limitation under the entity’s constitution) to enter into contracts with third parties, as do other persons authorised by directors. It is not incumbent upon a third party dealing with a corporate entity to make inquiries as to whether a director has the power to bind the company or authorise others to do so.

Where there is no valid or complete agreement

If the settlement agreement has not been properly completed then it may be possible to set aside the agreement.

Where there has been duress or undue influence

Where a party’s consent to a contact has been induced by duress, the contract is voidable by the ‘aggrieved party’. A threat sufficient to constitute duress could be actual or threatened violence, unlawful restraint to the person or property, or it could be an economic threat (such as a threat to terminate a contract). If there has been such a threat then this may invalidate the terms of a settlement agreement.

Where the settlement agreement is illegal as a result of statute or the general law

Illegality could arise if the terms of an agreement contravene established statutory or common law principles or, alternatively, if the terms are contrary to public policy. For example, contracts that fix prices are prohibited under the Competition Act 1988.

If a court becomes aware of illegality the it may have the right to set aside the agreement and refuse to award any remedy (in the event of an alleged breach).

 

Where a mistake has been made about a fundamental matter or which makes it impossible to perform the settlement agreement

If there has been a mistake in a settlement agreement then the effect of this mistake depends upon the circumstances: depending upon various factors, a party could be bound by the mistake or, alternatively, the settlement agreement could be declared void. Whether a party will succeed in such an argument depends to a great extent on whether the mistake (if any) renders the contract impossible to perform or radically different from what it actually is.

 

Where there has been a misrepresentation of a material fact in certain circumstances

If there has been a misrepresentation of a material fact (whether this representation was fraudulent, negligent or innocent) then it may be possible to set aside the settlement agreement.

If you have entered into a settlement agreement with your employer and believe that the agreement should be set aside then please don’t hesitate to contact us to explore what action you could potentially take.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Share →

One Response to Employment law solicitor Chris Hadrill on the circumstances where it is possible to set aside settlement agreements

  1. […] the Employment Tribunal – one of these statutory requirements is that the agreement be valid: as addressed in this article, a party can argue that a settlement agreement is invalid if, for example, a party did not have […]

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3601
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number