Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The recent case of Singh v Glasgow University & Anor involved the issue of bias in the Employment Tribunal. Dr Singh is of English nationality and Sikh religion. He brought an Employment Tribunal case against his employers, Glasgow University, and colleagues in 2009. At the Employment Tribunal the Employment Judge gave permission to discharge Professor Gusterson, one of the Respondents. Dr Singh appealed against this decision, basing the reason for his appeal on the alleged bias of the Employment Tribunal against him. He was, he asserted, English and from an ethnic minority, and that there was anti-English sentiment in the Employment Tribunal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal emphatically rejected Dr Singh’s case, remarking that Dr Singh’s comments were “an unacceptable slur on the integrity of the Scottish judiciary”.

In this post we’ll take a look at bias in the Employment Tribunal and consider when such a ground of appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal may be appropriate. We’ll do so by looking at the following elements:

  1. What constitutes bias in the Employment Tribunal?
  2. When should you make a complaint of bias?
  3. Is it a good idea to base your appeal on the grounds of bias?
  4. How do you appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal?

What constitutes bias in the Employment Tribunal?

There are three “types” of bias that can be pleaded:

  1. Actual bias
  2. Automatic disqualification
  3. Real possibility of bias

Actual bias is where the Judge allows their decision to be influenced by partiality or prejudice on their behalf. This would entail (as the name suggests) showing that the Judge is actually biased. This is, obviously, difficult to do. If there is a question as to the partiality of the Judge then the best ground to appeal on is the real possibility of bias as there is a lower burden of proof for the Claimant to achieve.

Automatic disqualification is where the Judge (or a family member or partner) has an interest in the outcome of the case which could lead their partiality to be called into question. The first question to ask is: does the Judge have an interest (normally pecuniary or proprietary such as, for example, ownership of shares) that could realistically affect the Judge’s decision? If the Judge (or a family member of partner) does have such an interest then the next question to ask is is the potential effect of the interest so small as to be incapable of affecting the Judge’s decision? If there is a doubt relating to the second question then there should be a presumption that the Judge should be disqualified from presiding on the case. However, the question that should not be asked is “does the Judge have some link to a party involved in the case?”. The above test should be used instead.

The test of whether a real possibility of bias exists is the normal ground on which a bias appeal is based. In order to prove that there is a real possibility of bias the party must show that:

  1. There were circumstances that exist(ed) which suggests that the Judge was biased
  2. Those circumstances would lead a fair-minded and informed observer to conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased

The circumstances alluded to in the above test are, generally, five-fold:

  1. A personal friendship or animosity between the judge and any member of the public involved in the case;
  2. The judge is closely acquainted with any member of the public involved in the case, particularly if the credibility of that individual could be significant in the outcome of the case
  3. The judge has previously in a case rejected evidence of a person in such outspoken terms as to throw doubt on his ability to approach that person’s evidence with a fair mind
  4. The judge has expressed views, particularly in the course of a hearing, in such extreme and unbalanced terms as to throw doubt on their ability to try the issue with an objective judicial mind; and/or
  5. There are real grounds for doubting the ability of the Judge to ignore extraneous considerations, prejudice and predilections and bring an objective judgment to bear on the issues

Issues such as the judge’s nationality, ethnicity, social background, educational background, employment background and previous political associations (among others) will normally be insufficient grounds for proving a real possibility of bias.

When should you make a complaint of bias?

An application for appeal on the ground of bias can be made at any stage in the proceedings, including during hearings.

Is it a good idea to base your appeal on the grounds of bias?

You would need every convincing evidence of a real possibility of bias (or of a Judge’s interest in the outcome of a case) to justify submitting an appeal on the ground of bias. The judges in the Employment Appeal Tribunal, quite understandably, treat such allegations extremely seriously and making an unfounded allegation may seriously affect the potential of your case to be upheld on appeal. It’s generally better to appeal on grounds other than bias – for example perversity or a failure to adequately explain a decision.

How do you appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal?

You must submit a notice of appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal within 42 days of the date when the written reasons for the decision are sent to the parties. You should also send a skeleton argument of the Appeal at the same time as submitting the notice.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog.

Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Tagged with →  
Share →

One Response to Bias in the Employment Tribunal – a quick guide

  1. […] dismissal Bias in the Employment Tribunal – a quick guide Singh v Glasgow University & Anor – Bias in the Employment Tribunal By admin On July 23, […]

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 1 month ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 1 month ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 1 month ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago