Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Most unfair dismissal cases operate under the “normal” unfair dismissal rules – an employee (who has more than one year’s continuous employment) is unfairly dismissed by their employer for one of the “potentially fair” reasons (misconduct, capability, illegality, redundancy, or SOSR). “Normal” unfair dismissal cases are subject to a cap on compensation (currently £72,300 for the compensatory award) and there is the important hurdle of one year’s continuous employment to clear.

However, there are cases where there isn’t a cap on compensation and the one year’s continuous employment isn’t necessary. These cares are commonly referred to as “automatically unfair” dismissal. The rights conferred in “automatic unfair dismissal” cases all apply to employees and to some cases extend to workers. Although workers do not qualify to pursue their employer for the right of unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996 they can attempt to obtain redress from their employer if they are subject to a detriment for seeking to exercise certain rights. A detriment can include dismissal (and can also include post-termination detriments such as the giving of a bad reference). So, employees are protected from unfair dismissal and detriment for exercising the rights protected under the “automatic unfair dismissal” rules, and workers are protected from being subjected to a detriment (which can, confusingly, include being dismissed).

There are a specified number of cases in which the “relaxations” applying to automatic unfair dismissal apply. The cases where there is no need for one year’s continuous employment are listed below (among others):

  1. Dismissal or detriment connected to pregnancy or maternity
  2. Dismissal or detriment connected to the taking of leave for family reasons
  3. Dismissal or detriment connected to the exercising of rights under the Part Time Worker Regulations 2000
  4. Dismissal or detriment connected to the exercising of rights under the Fixed Term Employees Regulations 2002
  5. Dismissal or detriment connected to an application for flexible working
  6. Dismissal or detriment connected to health and safety reasons (such as the highlighting of the potential for an accident at work)
  7. Dismissal or detriment connected to Trade Union membership and/or representation
  8. Dismissal or detriment connected to exercising rights relating to grievance and disciplinary hearings in the workplace
  9. Dismissal or detriment connected to shop or betting workers refusing to work on a Sunday
  10. Dismissal or detriment connected to making a protected disclosure under the Protected Disclosure Act 1998
  11. Dismissal or detriment connected to unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010

The cases where there is a requirement of at least one year’s service include:

  1. Dismissal where the sole or principal reason for the dismissal is a TUPE transfer or for a reason connected with the transfer which does not fall inside the ETO exceptions
  2. Dismissal by reason of retirement
  3. Dismissal because your employer finds out about a spent conviction

Let’s take a hypothetical example from above to explain automatic unfair dismissal in a bit more detail. Annette started work at her employer 2 months ago in January 2011 and finds out she is pregnant. She takes Ordinary Maternity Leave (“OML”) and is due under her OML to return to work on 30 November 2011. However, she is not notified by her employer, Ben, that she is to return to work on the 30 November 2011 and therefore does not return on that date. Ben, being extremely annoyed about this, fires her. Although Annette wouldn’t normally be entitled to claim “normal” unfair dismissal in the circumstances (because she wouldn’t have the necessary one year’s employment) she could claim automatic unfair dismissal because her dismissal was connected with her maternity leave.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees

Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk.

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 1 month ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 1 month ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 1 month ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago