Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

If you’re involved in a dispute over copyright or think that your intellectual property in a work may be being infringed then you’ll want to know your rights relating to the work. This post therefore examines when you are entitled to copyright in a work (when copyright “subsists”) and a further post will examine what action should be taken when copyright is infringed.

The first thing to consider when determining what your rights are relating to copyright is what broad type of copyright exists. There are two possibilities:

  1. Literary, dramatic, musical or artistic (“LDMA”) copyright (also referred to as “Classic” copyright); or
  2. Entrepreneurial Copyright

The various sub-types of Classic copyright will be examined first, before moving on to look at Entrepreneurial copyright in the next post.

Classic copyright

Analysing what the “sub-type” of copyright in a work is is the first port of call. There are four sub-types – literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works. The first three (literary, dramatic and musical) are protected under s.3(1) Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 whereas artistic work is protected under s.4(1) CDPA 1988.

Literary work is defined as any work that is written, spoken or sung. It can include a table or a compilation (other than a database), a computer program, prepatory design material for a computer program, and databases (although this is subject to a slightly different type of protection).

Dramatic work includes dance or mime – it is a “work of action, with or without words or music, which is capable of performance”). This does not include poetry (even though it can be performed) as it is covered under literary work.

Musical work includes any work consisting of music, exclusive of any words or action that are intended to be sung, spoken or performed. If a work is intended to be sung or spoken then it would fall under “literary work” whereas if it were intended to be performed then it would fall under “artistic work”. Lyrics are therefore literary work and a particular musical choreography would be artistic work. The song itself is covered as both a literary and a musical work.

Artistic work includes graphic works, works of architecture, and works of artistic craftsmanship.

Originality, minimum effort and recording

In order for copyright to subsist in a work it has to be original. The author of the work must therefore have created the work through his or her own skill, judgment and individual effort, and that the work must not be simply copied. However, this does not mean that derivative works either breach copyright or are unprotected under the CPDA if they involve a sufficient degree of skill or labour to be original.

The work must also have required at least minimal effort to be covered by copyright. However, the threshold required for literary works is very low –there is no requirement for artistic merit in a work.

Further, the work must be recorded to be protected by copyright unless it is an artistic work under s.4(1) CPDA 1988. If it is an artistic work then no recording is required but some degree of performance is required for copyright to subsist.

Ownership

A crucial consideration for the subsistence of copyright is, obviously, who owns the copyright to that work. Potentially, there are two owners – the creator of the copyright (under s.9(1) CPDA 1988) or the first owner of the copyright in the work (s.11(1) CPDA 1988). Who owns the copyright depends upon the particular facts in the case. It involves an examination of the relationship between the creator of the work and the company that the creator works for (if that is indeed the case).

The first thing to do is check the creator’s contract of employment for any express terms regarding ownership of the copyright of works created by the employee. Clauses such as this are normal where the employee’s job does or may involve the creation of potentially valuable items.

Secondly, was the work created in the course of employment? If so, under s.11(2) CPDA 1988 the employer is presumed to be the owner of the copyright unless there is express agreement to the contrary (in, for example, the contract of employment). However, if the employer has only commissioned the work then the presumption is that the creator owns it, not the employer commissioning the work. Any commissioning of work should therefore involve an agreement which provides for assignment or licence of the copyright to that work. However, in the absence of any express agreement there is generally implied to be a licence in existence so that the employer can use the work it has commissioned.

Thirdly, the purpose that the work was created for should be looked at.

Fourthly, the extraneous facts of the case should be considered. What, for example, is the job description of the author? Has he or she created similar work previously? If so, how has that been treated in terms of ownership? Are there any minutes of meetings or memos regarding the idea? These can be extremely important in determining the ownership of the particular work.

Duration

How long does copyright subsist for? That depends on the type of work. Normally, copyright subsists for the life of the author plus seventy years (s.12 CPDA 1988). However, particular types of copyright can have less duration. For example, the radio broadcast of a song from a CD is only protected for fifty years from the end of the year it was first broadcast.

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 1 month ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 1 month ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 1 month ago

Keith

Quick fast professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael

"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago

Christine

Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago