Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

If you’re involved in a dispute over copyright or think that your intellectual property in a work may be being infringed then you’ll want to know your rights relating to the work. This post therefore examines when you are entitled to copyright in a work (when copyright “subsists”) and a further post will examine what action should be taken when copyright is infringed.

The first thing to consider when determining what your rights are relating to copyright is what broad type of copyright exists. There are two possibilities:

  1. Literary, dramatic, musical or artistic (“LDMA”) copyright (also referred to as “Classic” copyright); or
  2. Entrepreneurial Copyright

The various sub-types of Classic copyright will be examined first, before moving on to look at Entrepreneurial copyright in the next post.

Classic copyright

Analysing what the “sub-type” of copyright in a work is is the first port of call. There are four sub-types – literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works. The first three (literary, dramatic and musical) are protected under s.3(1) Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 whereas artistic work is protected under s.4(1) CDPA 1988.

Literary work is defined as any work that is written, spoken or sung. It can include a table or a compilation (other than a database), a computer program, prepatory design material for a computer program, and databases (although this is subject to a slightly different type of protection).

Dramatic work includes dance or mime – it is a “work of action, with or without words or music, which is capable of performance”). This does not include poetry (even though it can be performed) as it is covered under literary work.

Musical work includes any work consisting of music, exclusive of any words or action that are intended to be sung, spoken or performed. If a work is intended to be sung or spoken then it would fall under “literary work” whereas if it were intended to be performed then it would fall under “artistic work”. Lyrics are therefore literary work and a particular musical choreography would be artistic work. The song itself is covered as both a literary and a musical work.

Artistic work includes graphic works, works of architecture, and works of artistic craftsmanship.

Originality, minimum effort and recording

In order for copyright to subsist in a work it has to be original. The author of the work must therefore have created the work through his or her own skill, judgment and individual effort, and that the work must not be simply copied. However, this does not mean that derivative works either breach copyright or are unprotected under the CPDA if they involve a sufficient degree of skill or labour to be original.

The work must also have required at least minimal effort to be covered by copyright. However, the threshold required for literary works is very low –there is no requirement for artistic merit in a work.

Further, the work must be recorded to be protected by copyright unless it is an artistic work under s.4(1) CPDA 1988. If it is an artistic work then no recording is required but some degree of performance is required for copyright to subsist.

Ownership

A crucial consideration for the subsistence of copyright is, obviously, who owns the copyright to that work. Potentially, there are two owners – the creator of the copyright (under s.9(1) CPDA 1988) or the first owner of the copyright in the work (s.11(1) CPDA 1988). Who owns the copyright depends upon the particular facts in the case. It involves an examination of the relationship between the creator of the work and the company that the creator works for (if that is indeed the case).

The first thing to do is check the creator’s contract of employment for any express terms regarding ownership of the copyright of works created by the employee. Clauses such as this are normal where the employee’s job does or may involve the creation of potentially valuable items.

Secondly, was the work created in the course of employment? If so, under s.11(2) CPDA 1988 the employer is presumed to be the owner of the copyright unless there is express agreement to the contrary (in, for example, the contract of employment). However, if the employer has only commissioned the work then the presumption is that the creator owns it, not the employer commissioning the work. Any commissioning of work should therefore involve an agreement which provides for assignment or licence of the copyright to that work. However, in the absence of any express agreement there is generally implied to be a licence in existence so that the employer can use the work it has commissioned.

Thirdly, the purpose that the work was created for should be looked at.

Fourthly, the extraneous facts of the case should be considered. What, for example, is the job description of the author? Has he or she created similar work previously? If so, how has that been treated in terms of ownership? Are there any minutes of meetings or memos regarding the idea? These can be extremely important in determining the ownership of the particular work.

Duration

How long does copyright subsist for? That depends on the type of work. Normally, copyright subsists for the life of the author plus seventy years (s.12 CPDA 1988). However, particular types of copyright can have less duration. For example, the radio broadcast of a song from a CD is only protected for fifty years from the end of the year it was first broadcast.

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.62 Average

39 Reviews

Katelyn

The solicitor communicated well with me and made sure I understood everything. He did everything needed for my settlement agreement and tried to get the wording changed in my favour too.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Redmans provided excellent services

Posted 3 days ago

Sibel U

Excellent service

Posted 3 days ago

Peter S

I was very happy with the level of advise I received from Caroline Lewis, and a very professional service fron Chris, The advice given really helped me and I was comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. I would be more than happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 3 days ago

Derek S

I very much appreciated the help provided by Redmans in the settlement agreement agreed with my former employer.

Posted 4 days ago

Waseem M

It was the first ime I used Redmans Solicitors and to be honest, thety were amazing. Rana Tandon and Chris Hadrill were out of this world. They made the process as simply and smooth as can be. Thank you so much for all your support over the last week.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Worked very quickly considering right deadlines - and gave great advice

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Redmans provided me with excellent advice at a very stressful time. The calm, confident and extremely professional manner in which my solicitor handled my case made the issue much easier to deal with and I was very impressed with the level of service I received.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Immediate response to my initial enquiry. Very clear throughout the whole process and thorough and great communication which worked really well during quite a stressful time. Chris Hadrill was extremely helpful and made me feel at ease.

Posted 3 months ago

Nick D

I received a very professional service from Chris. The advice given really helped to leave me comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. Would be happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service from initial contact to deliverables.

Posted 4 months ago

Virginia K

Yes, Chris Hadrill answered all my questions and I feel more confident with my current situation

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill was referred to me my a friend of mine. I found the service to be efficient, quick and like Chris's direct approach to my work. Well done and thank you Chris!

Posted 4 months ago

Andy W

Very prompt & structured service that helped put my mind at rest at a difficult time

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

I have found Redmans to be very helpful, diligant and thoroughly professional when dealing with them, plus they gone that extra mile for me !

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Thank you to Chris Hadrill at Redmans for his assistance in settling my case. I contacted him at the very last minute and he was happy to help me and managed to get everything done on time and in a very professional manner. I will definitely be happy to work with him again .

Posted 4 months ago

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 8 months ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 8 months ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 8 months ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 9 months ago